Delhi High Court

O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.)/776/2026 of M/S LIVGUARD ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES PRIVATE LIMITED Vs ARIHANT ENTERPRISES on 30 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

776/2026 Page 1 of 2 $~69 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010471802026 + O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 776/2026 M/S LIVGUARD ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES PRIVATE LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Diwakar Singh, Adv. versus ARIHANT ENTERPRISES .....Respondent Through: None.

$~69

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

CNR No. DLHC010471802026

+

O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 776/2026

M/S LIVGUARD ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES PRIVATE

LIMITED

.....Petitioner

Through:

Mr. Diwakar Singh, Adv.

versus

ARIHANT ENTERPRISES

.....Respondent

Through:

None.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE OM PRAKASH SHUKLA

ORDER(ORAL)

%

30.09.2026

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. The present petition has been filed under Sections 29A(4) and 29A(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 19961 seeking extension of the mandate of the learned Sole Arbitrator, Hon’ble Ms. Justice Asha Menon (Retd.), Former Judge, Delhi High Court.

2. It is borne out by the record that vide order dated 19.08.2026, the learned Sole Arbitrator recorded that the arguments stood concluded and the matter was reserved for the award and, therefore, the arbitral proceedings have reached the stage of pronouncement of the award.

3. Affidavit of advance service has also been filed along with the petition. Despite advance service upon the Respondent, no one has appeared.

4. In view of the stage of the proceedings, sufficient cause is made Signed By:ANUBHAV TRIPATHI Signing Date:30.09.2026 18:39:25 Signature Not Verified out for extending the mandate of the learned Sole Arbitrator. No prejudice will be caused to any party by grant of an extension of the mandate by this Court as the matter stands reserved for the arbitral award.

5. Accordingly, the present petition is allowed and the mandate of the learned Sole Arbitrator is extended for a further period of two months with effect from 19.09.2026. The intervening period till today also stands regularised.

6. The petition stands disposed of.

OM PRAKASH SHUKLA, J SEPTEMBER 30, 2026/gunn

1 “Act” hereinafter Signed By:ANUBHAV TRIPATHI Signing Date:30.09.2026 18:39:25 Signature Not Verified

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead