Delhi High Court

W.P.(C)/4325/2025 of AMIT KUMAR GUPTA Vs UNION OF INDIA & ORS. on 30 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010184762025 + W.P.(C) 4325/2025, CM APPL. 20031/2025 AMIT KUMAR GUPTA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Priyadarshi Manish and Mr. Kshitiz Kishor Rai, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Vaishali Gupta, PC. CORAM: HON'BLE

$~19

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

#

CNR No. DLHC010184762025

+

W.P.(C) 4325/2025, CM APPL. 20031/2025

AMIT KUMAR GUPTA

.....Petitioner

Through:

Mr.

Priyadarshi

Manish

and

Mr. Kshitiz Kishor Rai, Advs.

versus

UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

.....Respondents

Through:

Ms. Vaishali Gupta, PC.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHARAT PARASHAR

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

O R D E R

% 30.09.2026

1. Admittedly, the Petitioner has a remedy of Appeal against the order dated 31.01.2025.

2. A common order has been passed against twenty-eight (28) notices while adjudicating the proceedings under Section 74 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as ‘CGST Act’]. The Adjudicating Authority has found that the Petitioner has availed ineligible Input Tax Credit (‘ITC’) by fraudulent means on the strength of bogus invoices issued by non-existent firms.

3. With regard to Section 122(1A) of the CGST Act, this Bench by an elaborate judgment dated 29.09.2026 in W.P.(C) 13883/2026 captioned Parag Garg vs. Commissioner, Adjudication, CGST Delhi West and Anr. and other connected matters has held that the Section 122(1A) of the CGST Act is applicable even to non-taxable person, but the provision does not have retrospective effect. This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 05/10/2026 at 11:11:25

4. Keeping in view the aforesaid position, the Petitioner, if so advised, may avail the remedy of Appeal.

5. With these observations, the present Writ Petition, along with pending application, is disposed of. ANIL KSHETARPAL, J. BHARAT PARASHAR, J. SEPTEMBER 30, 2026 s.godara/ad This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 05/10/2026 at 11:11:25

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead