Delhi High Court

W.P.(C)/16471/2025 of MONIKA Vs UNION OF INDIA & ANR. on 30 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Page 1 of 2 $~5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010830492025 + W.P.(C) 16471/2025 & CM APPL. 67464/2025 MONIKA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Mohd. Tarif, Advocate. versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Somesh Chandra Jha, Advocate for R-2.

W.P.(C) 16471/2025

$~5

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

CNR No. DLHC010830492025

+

W.P.(C) 16471/2025 & CM APPL. 67464/2025

MONIKA

.....Petitioner

Through:

Mr. Mohd. Tarif, Advocate.

versus

UNION OF INDIA & ANR.

.....Respondents

Through:

Mr. Somesh Chandra Jha,

Advocate for R-2.

CORAM:

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

O R D E R

%

30.09.2026

1. The petitioner was a candidate for appointment as Trained Graduate Teacher – Physical Education Teacher (Female), pursuant to a recruitment initiated by respondent No. 2 – National Education Society for Tribal Students [“NESTS”] in the year 2023. She was called for document verification, but has subsequently not been issued an appointment letter.

2. The petitioner has made representations on 18.06.2025 and 22.07.2025, and also issued a legal notice dated 20.08.2025 to respondent No.2-NESTS in this regard.

3. Mr. Mohd. Tarif, learned counsel for the petitioner, limits the relief sought in the present petition to consideration of the petitioner’s representation.

4. Mr. Somesh Chandra Jha, learned counsel for NESTS, who This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 05/10/2026 at 11:18:53

W.P.(C) 16471/2025

appears on advance notice, states upon instructions that the petitioner was ineligible as she did not have the requisite educational qualification provided in the advertisement. He states that reasons for her rejection will be communicated to her in writing, within a period of two weeks from today.

5. The petition, alongwith pending application, is accordingly disposed of on the above submissions, and without prejudice to the rights and remedies of the petitioner on merits. PRATEEK JALAN, J SEPTEMBER 30, 2026 ‘pv’/SM/ This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 05/10/2026 at 11:18:53

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead