Delhi High Court

ARB.P./1548/2026 of NAMAN AGARWAL (PROPRIETOR OF MS RADHE RADHE) Vs M/S FERNS N PETALS PVT LTD & ANR. on 30 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

1548/2026 Page 1 of 5 $~17 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010407332026 + ARB.P. 1548/2026 NAMAN AGARWAL (PROPRIETOR OF MS RADHE RADHE) .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Kshitiz Garg, Adv. versus M/S FERNS N PETALS PVT LTD & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sandeep Bisht,

$~17

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

CNR No. DLHC010407332026

+

ARB.P. 1548/2026

NAMAN AGARWAL (PROPRIETOR OF MS RADHE

RADHE)

.....Petitioner

Through:

Mr. Kshitiz Garg, Adv.

versus

M/S FERNS N PETALS PVT LTD & ANR. .....Respondents

Through:

Mr. Sandeep Bisht, Adv.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE OM PRAKASH SHUKLA

JUDGMENT(ORAL)

%

30.09.2026

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Mr. Sandeep Bisht, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Respondents submits that he has no dispute with regard to the arbitration agreement between the parties.

2. It is well settled that while exercising jurisdiction under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act of 19961, the scope of enquiry is confined to examining the prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement.

3. In the present case, the arbitration agreement is contained in four composite agreements dated 20.08.2025 inter se the parties herein, as follows:

1 “Act” hereinafter

ARORA

“Contract Manufacturing Agreement

18.2. The arbitral tribunal shall consist of 1 (one) arbitrator, who is to be agreed upon by the Parties within 10 (ten) days of the Arbitration Notice. If the Parties fail to agree on the arbitrator

18.3

on the Parties. 18.4 The place of Arbitration shall be New Delhi and the language of arbitration shall be English. 18.5 Subject to arbitration as set out hereinabove, the courts at New Delhi shall have exclusive jurisdiction.”

Channel Partner Agreement

11.2. The arbitral tribunal shall consist of 1 (one) arbitrator, who is to be agreed upon by the Parties within 10 (ten) days of the Arbitration Notice. lf the Parties fail to agree on the arbitrator

11.3

ARORA

on the Parties.

11.4 The place of Arbitration shall be New Delhi and the language of arbitration shall be English.

11.5 Subject to arbitration as set out hereinabove, the courts at New Delhi shall have exclusive jurisdiction.”

Trademark and Know How License Agreement

14.2. The arbitral tribunal shall consist of 1 (one) arbitrator, who is to be agreed upon by the Parties within 10 (ten) days of the Arbitration Notice. If the Parties fail to agree on the arbitrator

14.3

on the Parties.

14.4 The arbitration proceedings shall be held in New Delhi, India. The award of the arbitrator shall be final and binding on the parties. The law governing the arbitration proceedings shall be the laws of India. The language of arbitration shall be English.”

4. In the aforesaid circumstances, this Court finds no impediment in appointing a Sole Arbitrator.

5. Accordingly, Mr. Sagar Saxena, Advocate, (Mob. No. 9871156571) is appointed as a learned Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes arisen between the parties. The learned Sole Arbitrator

ARORA

shall enter upon the reference within three weeks from today.

6. The learned Sole Arbitrator will proceed to the arbitration proceedings subject to furnishing requisite disclosures as required under Section 12(2) of the Act within six weeks of entering reference.

7. The arbitration shall be carried under the rules and aegis of Delhi International Arbitration Centre (“DIAC”). The learned Arbitrator shall be entitled to fees as per the Schedule of Fees maintained by the DIAC.

8. It shall be open to the parties to raise all pleas, including inter alia objections as to arbitrability, limitation and jurisdiction, before the learned Sole Arbitrator who shall decide the same in accordance with law.

9. It is clarified that the observations made herein are only for the purpose of deciding the present petition under Section 11(6) of the Act. The learned Sole Arbitrator shall adjudicate the disputes with claims and counter claims independently and on their own merits, uninfluenced by any observations contained in the present order.

10. The Registry is directed to send a receipt of this order to Mr. Sagar Saxena, learned Arbitrator through all permissible modes including email.

11. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of in the above

ARORA

terms. Pending applications, if any, stands disposed of.

OM PRAKASH SHUKLA, J SEPTEMBER 30, 2026/at

Signed By:PRAGYA ARORA

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead