Delhi High Court
CRL.M.C./4947/2026 of SATISH KUMAR & ORS. Vs STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. on 29 September 2026
4947/2026 Page 1 of 5 $~48 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % # CNR No.DLHC010306992026 Date of Decision : 29.09.2026 + SATISH KUMAR & ORS. .....Petitioners CRL.M.C. 4947/2026, Crl.M.A. 20732/2026 Through: Mr. Yash Narain, Ms. Suramya Srivastava, Mr. Shantanu Narain, Advs. along
CRL.M.C. 4947/2026 Page 1 of 5
$~48
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
%
CNR No.DLHC010306992026
Date of Decision : 29.09.2026
+
SATISH KUMAR & ORS.
.....Petitioners
CRL.M.C. 4947/2026, Crl.M.A. 20732/2026
Through:
Mr. Yash Narain, Ms. Suramya
Srivastava, Mr. Shantanu Narain,
Advs. along with Mr. Satish Kumar
(P-1 In Person) and Mrs. Long Shree
(P-3) In Person
versus
STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. .....Respondents
Through:
SI Akash Singh (P.S. Laxmi Nagar)
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
2
Decisions referred to
In this index
2
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No. 0560/2018 registered at P.S. Shakarpur, under Sections 498A/406/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. The prosecution arose from matrimonial relationship between the petitioner no.1 and the respondent no.2. SACHIN DATTA, J. (ORAL)
2. The petitioner no.1 and the respondent no.2 have entered into a Settlement Deed dated 05.10.2024. The aforesaid settlement agreement has been appended as Annexure P-4 to the present petition; the true typed copy of the same reads as under:-
Digitally Signed By:UMANG Signing Date:01.10.2026 20:50:41 Signature Not Verified
CRL.M.C. 4947/2026 Page 2 of 5
Digitally Signed By:UMANG Signing Date:01.10.2026 20:50:41 Signature Not Verified
CRL.M.C. 4947/2026 Page 3 of 5
Digitally Signed By:UMANG Signing Date:01.10.2026 20:50:41 Signature Not Verified
CRL.M.C. 4947/2026 Page 4 of 5
Digitally Signed By:UMANG Signing Date:01.10.2026 20:50:41 Signature Not Verified
CRL.M.C. 4947/2026 Page 5 of 5
3. It can be seen that the aforesaid settlement deed contemplates payment of Rs. 10,00,000/- to the respondent no.2 in two instalments. The respondent no.2, identified by the Investigation Officer (I.O.) confirms that the agreed amount has been received and that she has no surviving claims against the petitioner.
4. The petitioner no.2 has expired during the pendency of the present proceedings. The petitioner no.1 and the petitioner no.3 are present in Court and have also been identified by the Investigation Officer (I.O.).
5. In terms of the dicta laid down by the Supreme Court in in Gian Singh v. State of Punjab, (2012) 10 SCC 303; and Narinder Singh v. State of Punjab, (2014) 6 SCC 466, there is no impediment in acceding to the joint request of the petitioners and the respondent no.2, for quashing of the FIR No. 0560/2018 and all proceedings emanating therefrom.
6. Consequently, the present petition is allowed; FIR No. 0560/2018 and the proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.
SEPTEMBER 29, 2026/uk
SACHIN DATTA, J Digitally Signed By:UMANG Signing Date:01.10.2026 20:50:41 Signature Not Verified