Delhi High Court
CRL.M.C./2486/2026 of ROBIN KUMAR AND OTHERS Vs THE STATE AND ANOTHER on 29 September 2026
2486/2026 Page 1 of 2 pages $~10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 29.09.2026 # CNR No. DLHC010129852026 + CRL.M.C. 2486/2026 ROBIN KUMAR AND OTHERS .....Petitioners Through: Petitioners in person. Counsel for petitioners (appearance not given) versus THE STATE AND
Page 1 of 2 pages
$~10
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
%
Date of Decision: 29.09.2026
CNR No. DLHC010129852026
+
CRL.M.C. 2486/2026
ROBIN KUMAR AND OTHERS
.....Petitioners
Through:
Petitioners in person.
Counsel for petitioners (appearance
not given)
versus
THE STATE AND ANOTHER
.....Respondents
Through:
Ms. Manjeet Arya, APP for State with
ASI Girish.
Respondent No.2 in person.
CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA
J U D G M E N T (ORAL)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Petitioners seek quashing of case FIR No. 316/2025 of PS Harsh Vihar for offence under Section 498A/406/34 IPC and Section 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act on the ground that the complainant de facto (respondent no.2) has compromised the disputes with the petitioners.
2. At the outset, learned APP for State points out that till date divorce decree has not been passed. Admittedly, there has been no resumption of GIRISH KATHPALIA Digitally signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI, 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec45 569af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d1557 0996b40f80cbd2eee60402c487965ff801e26fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2026.09.29 17:08:32 +05'30' Digitally Signed By:RAHUL YADAV Signing Date:29.09.2026 17:10:34 Signature Not Verified
Page 2 of 2 pages matrimony of petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2.
3. It appears that on past 03 dates, the matter was being got adjourned on one or the other pretext because learned counsel was fully aware about there being no dissolution of marriage between respondent no.2 and petitioner no.1. In the absence of clear status of matrimony of petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2, it would not be apposite to invoke inherent powers and quash the subject FIR.
4. That being so, the present petition is dismissed, granting liberty to the parties to file afresh after getting the marriage between petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 dissolved by way of decree of divorce.
GIRISH KATHPALIA (JUDGE) SEPTEMBER 29, 2026/ry GIRISH KATHPALIA Digitally signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI, 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec4 5569af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d15 570996b40f80cbd2eee60402c487965ff801e 26fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2026.09.29 17:08:04 +05'30' Digitally Signed By:RAHUL YADAV Signing Date:29.09.2026 17:10:34 Signature Not Verified