Delhi High Court

CONT.CAS(C)/1815/2026 of DEEPTI CHADHA AND ORS Vs A F PINTO AND ORS on 29 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

& Connected Matter Page 1 of 2 $~77 & 78 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010470092026 + CONT.CAS(C) 1815/2026 & CM APPL. 67693/2026 DEEPTI CHADHA AND ORS .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Karan Chaudhary, Advocate. versus A F PINTO AND ORS .....Respondents

CONT.CAS(C) 1815/2026 & Connected Matter

$~77 & 78

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

CNR No. DLHC010470092026

+

CONT.CAS(C) 1815/2026 & CM APPL. 67693/2026

DEEPTI CHADHA AND ORS

.....Petitioners

Through:

Mr. Karan Chaudhary, Advocate.

versus

A F PINTO AND ORS

.....Respondents

Through:

Mr.

Romy

Chacko,

Senior

Advocate with Mr. Ashwin Romy,

Advocate for R-1.

Mr. Sujeet Kumar Mishra, Mr.

Harsh Kumar Pandey & Ms.

Chanchal, Advocates for DoE.

CNR No. DLHC010470142026

+

CONT.CAS(C) 1816/2026 & CM APPL. 67696/2026

MEENU SAINI AND ORS

.....Petitioners

Through:

Mr. Karan Chaudhary, Advocate

versus

VANDANA GUPTA AND ORS

.....Respondents

Through:

Mr. Kamal Gupta, Mrs. Tripti

Gupta, Mr. Sparsh Aggarwal &

Mr. Siddharth Arora, Advocates.

Mr. V. Balaji & Mr. Nizamuddin,

Advocates

for

R-3/DoE.

[M:98110206591]

CORAM:

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

O R D E R

%

29.09.2026

1. The petitioners allege contempt of an order dated 13.05.2026, passed in W.P. (C) 11480/2015 and connected matters. Mr. Karan Chaudhary, learned counsel for the petitioners, seeks permission to This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/10/2026 at 11:13:46

CONT.CAS(C) 1815/2026 & Connected Matter withdraw these contempt petitions, as the writ petitions of the present petitioners, i.e. W.P.(C)

and W.P.(C) 10634/2025 respectively, are not covered by the said order.

2. Mr. Chaudhary also submits that the petitioners in CONT.CAS(C) 1816/2026, would first like to make a representation to the concerned school. The petitioners are at liberty to do so.

3. The contempt petitions, alongwith pending applications, are dismissed as withdrawn, without prejudice to any rights and liberty available to the petitioners in law, in view of the above submissions.

4. It is, however, clarified that the Court has not made any comments on the merits of the matters. PRATEEK JALAN, J SEPTEMBER 29, 2026 ‘pv’/MK/ This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/10/2026 at 11:13:46

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead