Delhi High Court

W.P.(C)/16707/2025 of RAHUL CHAUDHARY Vs UNION OF INDIA & ANR. on 29 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010857992025 + W.P.(C) 16707/2025 RAHUL CHAUDHARY ......Petitioner Through: Mr. Atul Verma and Mr. Mahabir Singh Basoya, Advocates versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Ansuhree Narain, SCC with Mr. Apurv Yadav and Mr. Naman

$~15

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

CNR No. DLHC010857992025

+

W.P.(C) 16707/2025

RAHUL CHAUDHARY

......Petitioner

Through:

Mr. Atul Verma and Mr.

Mahabir

Singh

Basoya,

Advocates

versus

UNION OF INDIA & ANR.

.....Respondents

Through:

Ms. Ansuhree Narain, SCC

with Mr. Apurv Yadav and Mr.

Naman Choula, Advs.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHARAT PARASHAR

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

O R D E R

%

29.09.2026

1. Through the present petition, the Petitioner prays for issuance of Writ of Certiorari to quash Order dated 13.11.2024, whereby the Petitioner’s GST registration has been cancelled on account of non- availability of the registered person when the business premises was visited by the official of the GST Department.

2. The Petitioner also filed an application for revocation of his cancelled GST registration, which was also rejected on 16.03.2025, as the Petitioner, despite Show Cause Notice, failed to file copies of the tax invoices and other documents, namely, the rent agreement of the business premises.

3. Along with the writ petition, the Petitioner has produced certain This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 05/10/2026 at 11:05:37

tax invoices and the rent agreement.

4. Learned counsel representing the Petitioner submits that the Petitioner is a small businessman and he was not aware of the intricacies of law.

5. On a Court question, learned counsel representing the Respondents submitted that the Petitioner may file an application within a period of two (02) weeks for recall of aforesaid order passed on 16.03.2025, along with all requisite documents, which shall be decided on merits within a period of the next six (06) weeks.

6. Keeping in view the aforesaid submissions made by the learned counsel representing the Respondents, Petition is disposed of in the above terms.

ANIL KSHETARPAL, J

BHARAT PARASHAR, J SEPTEMBER 29, 2026/JYH/MN

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 05/10/2026 at 11:05:37

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead