Delhi High Court
O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.)/765/2026 of VINAY MITTAL Vs SUSHIL CHAUDHARY AND ANR on 29 September 2026
HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010469002026 + O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 765/2026 VINAY MITTAL .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Bani Brar, Advocate. versus SUSHIL CHAUDHARY AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Md. Adil Alam, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELA O R D E R
$~43
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
CNR No. DLHC010469002026
+
O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 765/2026
VINAY MITTAL
.....Petitioner
Through:
Ms. Bani Brar, Advocate.
versus
SUSHIL CHAUDHARY AND ANR
.....Respondents
Through:
Mr. Md. Adil Alam, Advocate.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
%
29.09.2026
1. This is a petition under Section 29A (4) and (5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the “Act”) seeking extension of the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal for conclusion of the proceedings.
2. It is stated that the learned Arbitral Tribunal has already heard the final arguments and the arbitration case is reserved for passing of the award.
3. Ms. Bani Brar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, seeks an extension of mandate of the learned Arbitral Tribunal for a period of four months form this Court.
4. In view thereof, issue notice.
5. Notice accepted by Mr. Md. Adil Alam, learned counsel appearing for the respondent, who has no objection in case the time as sought to extend the mandate of the learned Arbitral Tribunal, is granted.
6. It is noted that the mandate of the Tribunal expired on 06.07.2026. In that context, the time which has lapsed from 07.07.2026 till date is regularized. Having regard to the fact that the learned counsel for the respondent has no This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 05/10/2026 at 12:03:41
objection in case the extension of time is granted, the mandate of the learned Tribunal is extended for a further period of four months from date.
7. The petition is allowed and disposed of in the above terms.
TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J SEPTEMBER 29, 2026 yrj
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 05/10/2026 at 12:03:41