Delhi High Court
BAIL APPLN./2854/2026 of MR X Vs STATE NCT OF DELHI on 29 September 2026
2854/2026 Page 1 of 3 pages $~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 29.09.2026 # CNR No. DLHC010320332026 + BAIL APPLN. 2854/2026 MR X .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Abhiik Chimni, Mr. Ayan Dasgupta and Mr. Gurpal Singh, Advocates versus STATE NCT OF DELHI
$~4
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
%
Date of Decision: 29.09.2026
CNR No. DLHC010320332026
+
BAIL APPLN. 2854/2026
MR X
.....Petitioner
Through:
Mr.
Abhiik
Chimni,
Mr.
Ayan
Dasgupta and Mr. Gurpal Singh,
Advocates
versus
STATE NCT OF DELHI
.....Respondent
Through:
Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for State
with SI Komal and Inspector Manish
Verma, SHO, PS Cyber, New Delhi
CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA
J U D G M E N T (ORAL)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The accused/applicant seeks regular bail in case FIR No. 07/2026 of PS Cyber, New Delhi District for offence under Section 112(2)/317(2)/318(4)/61(2) of BNS.
2. Despite the seriousness of circumstances mentioned in last orders, the updated status report of DCP concerned has not been filed. GIRISH KATHPALIA
Date: 2026.09.29 14:13:38 +05'30'
3. Learned APP for State, on instructions of IO/SI Komal and Inspector Manish Verma, SHO, PS Cyber, New Delhi, submits that prosecution has no objection if the present accused/applicant also is granted regular bail.
4. Broadly speaking, the allegation against the present accused/applicant is that being part of cyber fraud network, he is one of the beneficiaries of the allegedly cheated amount. As per prosecution case, the allegedly cheated amount came into the bank account held jointly by the present accused/applicant and co-accused Saleem.
5. One of the major grounds for seeking bail is that the co-accused Saleem as well as the remaining accused persons, namely H.S. Kohli, Sandeep, Nasim and Santosh have not been arrested. The argument on behalf of the accused/applicant has been that the police cannot be allowed to pick and choose when it comes to arresting an accused. On this aspect, order dated 25.08.2026 noted the submission of the IO that she had decided to arrest Saleem but the senior police officers told her not to do so. On this aspect, a detailed updated status report from the concerned DCP was called, but that report has not been filed.
6. It is in these circumstances that learned APP for State, on instructions of both police officers present in courtroom, submits that State has no objection to grant of bail to the present accused/applicant on the principle of parity. GIRISH KATHPALIA
Date: 2026.09.29 14:13:28 +05'30'
7. Accordingly, this bail application is allowed and the accused/applicant is directed to be released on bail subject to his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court/Duty Magistrate.
8. A copy of this order be immediately transmitted to the concerned Jail Superintendent for informing the accused/applicant.
GIRISH KATHPALIA (JUDGE) SEPTEMBER 29, 2026/as GIRISH KATHPALIA
Date: 2026.09.29 14:13:15 +05'30'