Delhi High Court

CRL.M.C./5980/2025 of RAJ KUMAR Vs STATE GOVT. OF NCT DELHI AND ANR on 28 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010617602025 + CRL.M.C. 5980/2025 CRL.M.A. 25443/2025 RAJ KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: None versus STATE GOVT. OF NCT DELHI AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Naresh Chahar, APP for the State with Mr. Rishabh Tyagi, Mr. Rupesh Gupta and Mr.

$~32

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

CNR No. DLHC010617602025

+

CRL.M.C. 5980/2025 CRL.M.A. 25443/2025

RAJ KUMAR

.....Petitioner

Through:

None

versus

STATE GOVT. OF NCT DELHI AND ANR

.....Respondents

Through:

Mr. Naresh Chahar, APP for the State

with Mr. Rishabh Tyagi, Mr. Rupesh

Gupta and Mr. Satyam Kumar, Advs.

SI Himanshu, PS Sultanpuri

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

O R D E R

%

28.09.2026

1. None appears on behalf of the Petitioner.

2. The matter was passed over to enable the Investigating Officer (IO) to inform the parties and direct them to remain present.

3. At the pass over, learned APP for the State states on instructions of the IO that the Petitioner is not available today. He states that peculiarly, the present petition seeking quashing of the FIR has been filed by the complainant and not the accused. The petition is dismissed for non- prosecution.

4. Considering the fact that the petition has been filed on the basis of the settlement, if the settlement survives the accused may approach the Court by filing an appropriate petition. The petition when filed, it would be decided This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 08/10/2026 at 11:25:14

on its own merits.

5. Pending application is disposed of. MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA, J SEPTEMBER 28, 2026/msh

6. At subsequent stage, Mr. Kaushal Kishore Lal Gautam, Advocate has entered appearance on behalf of the petitioner and he states that he may be granted liberty to withdraw this petition.

7. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

8. The previous order of dismissal is recalled. MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA, J SEPTEMBER 28, 2026/msh This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 08/10/2026 at 11:25:14

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead