Delhi High Court

O.M.P.(I) (COMM.)/447/2026 of MACCAFERRI INFRASTRUCTURE PVT LTD Vs NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AND INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LIMITED & ORS. on 28 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010465962026 + O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 447/2026, I.A. 26950/2026, I.A. 26951/2026 & I.A. 26952/2026 MACCAFERRI INFRASTRUCTURE PVT LTD .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Palash S. Singhai, Mr. Harshal Sareen, Ms. Srishti Ramchandani, Ms. Neha Kiran and Mr.

$~50

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

CNR No. DLHC010465962026

+

O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 447/2026, I.A. 26950/2026, I.A. 26951/2026 &

I.A. 26952/2026

MACCAFERRI INFRASTRUCTURE PVT LTD .....Petitioner Through:

Mr. Palash S. Singhai, Mr. Harshal

Sareen, Ms. Srishti Ramchandani, Ms.

Neha

Kiran

and

Mr.

Anuj

K.

Maheshwari, Advocates.

versus

NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AND INFRASTRUCTURE

DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LIMITED & ORS.

.....Respondents

Through:

Mr. S.K. Pandey, Mr. Anshul Rai and

Ms. Mallika Ranjan, Advocates.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELA

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

O R D E R

%

28.09.2026

1. This is a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking ad-interim measures of protection against the invocation and encashment of the bank guarantees and coercive action pursuant to show cause notice dated 18.09.2026.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner states that reply dated 26.09.2026 has already been submitted by the petitioner to the respondent no.1, which is yet to be considered.

3. Mr. S.K. Pandey, learned counsel appearing on advance notice for respondent no.1 states that he has no instructions in respect of the receipt of the reply to the impugned show cause notice, however, he states that the said reply, if received, shall be considered on its own merits. This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 30/09/2026 at 12:27:50

4. Having regard to the aforesaid and since the stage of any real and present apprehension is yet to arrive, this Court is right now not inclined to pass any orders.

5. However, it is relevant to note that the petitioner has stated that it is ready and willing to extend and keep the bank guarantees valid.

6. In view of the above, the present petition is disposed of directing the respondents to consider and dispose of the reply dated 26.09.2026 of the petitioner to the show cause notice dated 18.09.2026.

7. The petitioner is at liberty to approach this Court post such decision to be made by the respondent no.1

8. The petition is disposed of alongwith all the pending applications.

TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J SEPTEMBER 28, 2026/anj

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 30/09/2026 at 12:27:50

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead