Delhi High Court

W.P.(C)/14372/2026 of M/S BHARTIYA TAR UDYOG Vs UNION OF INDIA & ORS. on 28 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010467742026 + W.P.(C) 14372/2026, CM APPL. 67356/2026, CM APPL. 67357/2026 & CM APPL. 67358/2026 M/S BHARTIYA TAR UDYOG .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Malak Bhatt, Mr. Rajat Bector, Mr. Rajarshi Roy, Ms. Ashika Jain and Mr. Wamic Wasim Nargal,

$~31

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

#

CNR No. DLHC010467742026

+

W.P.(C) 14372/2026, CM APPL. 67356/2026, CM APPL.

67357/2026 & CM APPL. 67358/2026

M/S BHARTIYA TAR UDYOG

.....Petitioner

Through:

Mr. Malak Bhatt, Mr. Rajat Bector,

Mr. Rajarshi Roy, Ms. Ashika Jain

and Mr. Wamic Wasim Nargal, Advs.

versus

UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

.....Respondents

Through:

Mr. Rajeev Kumar, SPC

With Mr. Nring Chamwibo Zeliang,

GP.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHARAT PARASHAR

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

O R D E R

% 28.09.2026

1. Through the present petition, the Petitioner prays for quashing of the Demand-cum-Show Cause Notice dated 28.08.2026.

2. The impugned Demand-cum-Show Cause Notice has been issued to eighteen (18) noticees.

3. The Petitioner claims that the proceedings have been initiated beyond the prescribed period of limitation, and further contends that the allegations against the Petitioner pertain merely to a single transaction involving three

(03) different invoices.

4. Entertaining a Writ Petition at the stage, when only a Show Cause This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 29/09/2026 at 12:47:20

Notice has been issued, would not be appropriate, particularly when the Petitioner is yet to file a reply and raise objections before the competent Authority.

5. In these circumstances, the Petitioner, if so advised, may file a reply and raise objections before the concerned Authorities.

6. In view of the above, the present petition along with the pending applications stands disposed of. ANIL KSHETARPAL, J BHARAT PARASHAR, J SEPTEMBER 28, 2026/JYH/MN This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 29/09/2026 at 12:47:20

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead