Delhi High Court

W.P.(CRL)/3020/2026 of RAKHI AND ANOTHER Vs THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. on 28 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010462402026 + W.P.(CRL) 3020/2026, Crl.M.A. 30162/2026, Crl.M.A. 30161/2026 RAKHI AND ANOTHER .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Brijesh Yadav, AOR, Mr. Sourabh Yadav and Mr. Sahil Yadav, Advs. versus THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. .....Respondents

$~72

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

CNR No. DLHC010462402026

+

W.P.(CRL) 3020/2026, Crl.M.A. 30162/2026, Crl.M.A. 30161/2026

RAKHI AND ANOTHER

.....Petitioners

Through:

Mr.

Brijesh

Yadav,

AOR,

Mr.

Sourabh Yadav and Mr. Sahil Yadav,

Advs.

versus

THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS.

.....Respondents

Through:

Mr. Rahul Tyagi, ASC along with

Ms. Priya Rai, Mr. Sangeet Sibou,

Mr. Rahul Khanna, Advocates for

State

SI Amit Yadav, PS Karol Bagh.

Mr. Manjeet Singh, Adv. Respondent

no.2 to 6.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTA

%

28.09.2026

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

O R D E R

1. Vide order dated 24.09.2026, it was ordered as under:

2. Today, learned counsel for the respondent no(s). 2 to 6 enters appearance. It is submitted on behalf of the said respondents that they have no objection to the marriage of the petitioners and that they will not interfere in any manner whatsoever with the marital life of the petitioners, nor pose any threat to their security.

3. The said statement of the respondent no(s). 2 to 6, is taken on record.

4. Vide order dated 24.09.2026, liberty has already been granted to the petitioners to contact the concerned SHO in the event of any apprehension regarding their life and liberty. The said directions shall continue to operate.

5. It is submitted that the petitioners are in the process of shifting to Chandigarh. Needless to say, if required, the petitioners shall be at liberty to approach local police authorities for any assistance that may be required.

6. No further orders are required to be passed in the present petition, the same is accordingly, disposed of.

7. Pending application/s also stand disposed of.

SACHIN DATTA, J SEPTEMBER 28, 2026/at/nb

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead