Delhi High Court
W.P.(C)/15706/2025 of M S R L POLYMER PVT LTD THROUGH ITS AR SH AKHILESH KUMAR MAURYA & ORS. Vs OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER CGST DELHI SOUTH COMMISSIONERATE, THROUGH ITS COMMISSIONER & ANR. on 28 September 2026
HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010779362025 + W.P.(C) 15706/2025 and CM APPL. 64296/2025 M S R L POLYMER PVT LTD THROUGH ITS AR SH AKHILESH KUMAR MAURYA & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. R. P. Singh, Mr. Nirmal Dixit and Ms. Purva Dewangan, Advs. versus OFFICE OF THE
$~19
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
#
CNR No. DLHC010779362025
+
W.P.(C) 15706/2025 and CM APPL. 64296/2025
M S R L POLYMER PVT LTD THROUGH ITS AR SH
AKHILESH KUMAR MAURYA & ORS.
.....Petitioners
Through:
Mr. R. P. Singh, Mr. Nirmal
Dixit and Ms. Purva Dewangan,
Advs.
versus
OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER CGST DELHI SOUTH
COMMISSIONERATE, THROUGH ITS COMMISSIONER &
ANR.
.....Respondents
Through:
Mr. Aditya Singla, SSC.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHARAT PARASHAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
% 28.09.2026 CM APPL. 18110/2026 [For condonation of delay in filing the Rejoinder]
1. By way of the present application, the Petitioner seeks condonation of delay of thirty-three (33) days in filing the Rejoinder.
2. For the reasons, as stated in the application, the same is allowed and the delay is condoned. The Rejoinder is taken on record.
3. The application is disposed of. W.P.(C) 15706/2025
4. During the pendency of the present Writ Petition, rectified order dated 23.01.2026 has been passed while rectifying the Order-in- Original dated 31.01.2025.
5. The Petitioner has remedy of Appeal against the order dated This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 29/09/2026 at 12:47:21
23.01.2026.
6. Learned counsel representing the Petitioner does not dispute the aforesaid availability of alternative remedy of Appeal, however, he submits that the Petitioner should be granted some time to file the Appeal.
7. Keeping in view the peculiar facts and circumstances of the present case, the present Writ Petition, along with pending application, is disposed of while permitting the Petitioner to file the Appeal, within a period of next four (04) weeks, which shall be decided on merits and shall not be rejected on the ground of limitation. ANIL KSHETARPAL, J. BHARAT PARASHAR, J. SEPTEMBER 28, 2026 s.godara/ad This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 29/09/2026 at 12:47:21