Delhi High Court
BAIL APPLN./2798/2026 of FAIZAL Vs THE STATE on 28 September 2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010312742026 + BAIL APPLN. 2798/2026 FAIZAL .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Abbas Khan, Advocate (through videoconferencing) versus THE STATE .....Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for State with SI Mahesh and SI Ashish # CNR No.
$~3 & 4
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
CNR No. DLHC010312742026
+
BAIL APPLN. 2798/2026
FAIZAL
.....Petitioner
Through:
Mr. Abbas Khan, Advocate (through
videoconferencing)
versus
THE STATE
.....Respondent
Through:
Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for State
with SI Mahesh and SI Ashish
CNR No. DLHC010326672026
+
BAIL APPLN. 2910/2026
SALEEM
.....Petitioner
Through:
Mr. Abbas Khan, Advocate (through
videoconferencing)
versus
THE STATE GNCTD
.....Respondent
Through:
Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for State
with SI Mahesh and SI Ashish
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
%
28.09.2026
1. The accused/applicants seek regular bail in case FIR No. 858/2014 of PS Nand Nagri for offence under Section 394/397/174A/34 IPC.
2. Broadly speaking, the allegation against the accused/applicants is that in the process of robbery, accused Saleem caught hold of the victim from behind while accused Faizal inflicted ten stab wounds, after which the other This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 30/09/2026 at 11:04:41
co-accused Sunny and Kranti assaulted the victim with dandas. The accused/applicants evaded arrest and could be ultimately found after ten years of the incident.
3. After addressing partly, learned counsel for accused/applicants seeks permission to withdraw both these applications with liberty to file afresh if the trial is not concluded within six months from the date already fixed.
4. As requested, both these bail applications are dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as sought.
GIRISH KATHPALIA, J SEPTEMBER 28, 2026/as This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 30/09/2026 at 11:04:41