Delhi High Court

CRL.M.C./7159/2026 of JOGINDER SINGH & ORS. Vs STATE (GOVT OF NCT DELHI) & ANR. on 24 September 2026

Cites 1, Cited by 0

7159/2026 Page 1 of 3 pages $~52 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 24.09.2026 # CNR No. DLHC010458842026 + CRL.M.C. 7159/2026 & CRL.M.A. 29922/2026 JOGINDER SINGH & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Chanderkant Tyagi and Mr. D. P. Singh, Advocates with

$~52

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

%

Date of Decision: 24.09.2026

CNR No. DLHC010458842026

+

CRL.M.C. 7159/2026 & CRL.M.A. 29922/2026

JOGINDER SINGH & ORS.

.....Petitioners

Through:

Mr. Chanderkant Tyagi and Mr. D. P.

Singh, Advocates with petitioners.

versus

STATE (GOVT OF NCT DELHI) & ANR.

.....Respondents

Through:

Mr. Nawal Kishore Jha, APP for State

with SI Jag Mohan

Mr. Ram Nath Singh Kushwaha,

Advocate for R2 with R2 in person

CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA

J U D G M E N T (ORAL)

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

1

Decisions referred to

In this index

1

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Petitioners seek quashing of case FIR No. 88/2024 of PS Nihal Vihar for offence under Section 498A/406/354A/34 IPC on the ground that the complainant de facto (respondent no.2) has compromised the disputes with the petitioners.

GIRISH KATHPALIA

2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec 45569af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d15 570996b40f80cbd2eee60402c487965ff801e 26fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2026.09.24 17:14:41 +05'30'

2. Learned APP for State, assisted by IO/SI Jagmohan, accepts notice and submits that State has serious objection to this petition.

3. I have heard learned counsel for petitioners as well as learned APP for State. I have also interacted with respondent no. 2 (identified by the IO) in Hindi.

4. There are two vital issues in the present case, which dissuade me from allowing this petition. Those issues are as follows. 4.1 Till date, neither the matrimony between petitioner no. 3 and respondent no. 2 has been dissolved, nor there has been resumption of their matrimony till date. The respondent no. 2 in her interaction in Hindi submits that she has studied till 07th standard only. Looking into the educational and socio-economic status of respondent no.2, this Court cannot leave it to chance that after quashing of this FIR, there is no resumption of matrimony or consensual dissolution thereof. It needs to be ensured that a lady of such status is not being misguided to give her consent which is misused to quash this FIR. 4.2 Secondly, there are extremely serious allegations of sexual misconduct levelled in the FIR against petitioner no. 6. It is mentioned in the FIR that the petitioner no. 6, on finding her alone in her room entered and forcibly had sex with her. In the cases titled Narender Singh and Others vs State of Punjab and Another, (2014) 6 SCC 466; and Anand Kumar @ Sanjay Lalwani vs The State of Madhya Pradesh & Ors. SLP (CRL.) No. GIRISH KATHPALIA

2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec45 569af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d1557 0996b40f80cbd2eee60402c487965ff801e26fa , cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2026.09.24 17:14:31 +05'30'

19051/2025 (decided on 31.08.2026), the Hon’ble Supreme Court laid down the parameters to be kept in mind by the High Court before quashing an FIR. One such parameter in the present context is that where the FIR contains serious and heinous allegations of sexual misconduct, the High Court should not quash the FIR.

5. In view of above two circumstances, I do not find it a fit case to quash the subject FIR. Therefore, the petition and the accompanying application are dismissed.

GIRISH KATHPALIA (JUDGE) SEPTEMBER 24, 2026/as GIRISH KATHPALIA

2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4af ec45569af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacc a, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d 15570996b40f80cbd2eee60402c487965ff 801e26fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2026.09.24 17:14:19 +05'30'

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead