Delhi High Court

CRL.REV.P.(MAT.)/245/2025 of ANKIT ARORA Vs ROMA ARORA on 24 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Page 1 of 2 $~34 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 24.09.2026 # CNR No. DLHC010323312025 + CRL.REV.P.(MAT.) 245/2025 and Crl.M.A. 15950/2025 ANKIT ARORA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sarabjeet Singh, Adv. (through v/c) versus ROMA ARORA .....Respondent

CRL.REV.P.(MAT.)245/2025

$~34

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

%

Date of Decision: 24.09.2026

CNR No. DLHC010323312025

+

CRL.REV.P.(MAT.) 245/2025 and Crl.M.A. 15950/2025

ANKIT ARORA

.....Petitioner

Through:

Mr. Sarabjeet Singh, Adv. (through

v/c)

versus

ROMA ARORA

.....Respondent

Through:

Mr. Gurvinder Singh, Adv.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTA

SACHIN DATTA, J. (Oral.)

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. The petitioner/husband assails an order dated 15.01.2025, issued by the Ld. Judge, Family Courts, West District, Tis Hazari Courts, New Delhi, directing execution of interim maintenance of Rs. 13,500/- per month to the respondent/wife.

2. The petitioner also seeks adjustment of Rs. 1,70,000/- paid by him to the respondent for opening a fixed deposit in her name.

3. During the course of hearing, it is emphasised by learned counsel for the petitioner that an application under Section 127(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for cancellation of order dated 13.12.2023 was filed by the petitioner on 15.01.2025. However, the same remains undecided.

4. Considering the circumstances, the present petition is disposed of with a request to the learned Trial Court to decide the aforesaid application under Digitally Signed By:CHINU LUTHRA Signing Date:26.09.2026 13:16:52 Signature Not Verified

CRL.REV.P.(MAT.)245/2025

Section 127(2) as expeditiously as possible, and preferably within a period of three months from today.

5. The disposal of the maintenance petition may also be expedited.

6. The Ld. Family Court shall also determine whether, and to what extent, any adjustment is to be given to the petitioner in respect of the sum of Rs. 1,70,000/-, which is stated to have been given by the petitioner to the respondent for opening an FDR.

7. The petition is disposed of in the above directions.

SACHIN DATTA, J SEPTEMBER 24, 2026/cl/vk

Digitally Signed By:CHINU LUTHRA Signing Date:26.09.2026 13:16:52 Signature Not Verified

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead