Delhi High Court

W.P.(C)/8356/2025 of VIJAY KUMAR JAIN PROPRIETOR VARDHMAN INDUSTRIES Vs COMMISSIONER CGST DELHI NORTH DIVISION on 24 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010377682025 + W.P.(C) 8356/2025 VIJAY KUMAR JAIN PROPRIETOR VARDHMAN INDUSTRIES .....Petitioner Through: Mr. R.P. Singh & Mr. Nirmal Dixit, Advs. versus COMMISSIONER CGST DELHI NORTH DIVISION .....Respondent Through: Mr. Aakarsh Srivastava, SSC

$~31

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

CNR No. DLHC010377682025

+

W.P.(C) 8356/2025

VIJAY KUMAR JAIN PROPRIETOR VARDHMAN

INDUSTRIES

.....Petitioner

Through:

Mr. R.P. Singh & Mr. Nirmal Dixit,

Advs.

versus

COMMISSIONER CGST DELHI NORTH

DIVISION

.....Respondent

Through:

Mr. Aakarsh Srivastava, SSC with

Mr. Ashish Bansal, Mr. Anand

Pandey & Mr. Ankit Kumar, Advs.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHAIL JAIN

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

O R D E R

%

24.09.2026

1. This petition is filed seeking directions to the respondent to refund an amount of Rs.35,13,640/- alongwith interest under Section 11BB of the Central Excise Act, 1944.

2. The grievance is that inspite of filing an application on 23.05.2018, the needful has not been done till date.

3. Without commenting upon the merits of this case, this petition is disposed of with the direction to the respondent to consider and decide the application of the petitioner in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within two months from today after granting opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 28/09/2026 at 12:11:42

4. Needless to say, the petitioner would be at liberty to avail remedies in accordance with law, if aggrieved of the decision.

AVNEESH JHINGAN, J

SHAIL JAIN, J SEPTEMBER 24, 2026 ‘JK’

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 28/09/2026 at 12:11:42

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead