Delhi High Court

CRL.M.C./7140/2026 of RAISUDDIN MALIK Vs STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. on 24 September 2026

Cites 2, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010457702026 + CRL.M.C. 7140/2026 RAISUDDIN MALIK .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Alok Singh, Mr. Jai Bhagwan Dass and Mr. Subhash Yadav, Advs. along with petitioner in person. versus STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms.

$~58

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

CNR No. DLHC010457702026

+

CRL.M.C. 7140/2026

RAISUDDIN MALIK

.....Petitioner

Through:

Mr. Alok Singh, Mr. Jai Bhagwan

Dass and Mr. Subhash Yadav, Advs.

along with petitioner in person.

versus

STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR.

.....Respondents

Through:

Ms. Priyanka Dalal, APP for State.

Mr. Sanjeet K. Trivedi, Adv. for R-2 /

BSES (through v/c)

IS Deepak Panwar, PS Darya Ganj.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTA

%

24.09.2026

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

2

Decisions referred to

In this index

2

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

O R D E R

1. The application is disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to file certified copy of annexures before the next date of hearing. Crl.M.A. 29839/2026 (Exemption from filing certified copy of annexures)

2. The petitioner / Mr. Raisuddin Malik seeks quashing of FIR No. 392/2021 dated 06.10.2021, filed under Section 135 of the Indian Electricity Act, 1910, at P.S. Darya Ganj, Delhi. The said FIR was registered at the instance of respondent no.2 / BSES Yamuna Power Ltd. CRL.M.C. 7140/2026

3. The petitioner also seeks quashing of the subsequent proceedings in SC No. 541/2023, titled as ‘State vs. Raisuddin Malik’, pending before the learned Special Judge, Electricity-02, Central. THC, Delhi. This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 26/09/2026 at 11:15:20

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that a composite Settlement Agreement has been arrived at with the respondent no.2 / BSES Yamuna Power Ltd in relation to the same. A copy of the said agreement has been placed on record as Annexure P-3 to the present petition.

5. It is conceded by learned counsel for respondent no.2 that the requisite amount has been paid by the petitioner, and that the disputes as regards the claims of the respondent no.2 stands fully settled.

6. The respondent no.2 has no objection to the quashing of the said FIR, and the proceedings arising from it.

7. Considering the circumstances, in terms of dicta laid down by the Supreme Court in Gian Singh v. State of Punjab, (2012) 10 SCC 303 and Narinder Singh v. State of Punjab, (2014) 6 SCC 466, and the fact that an offence under Section 135 of the Indian Electricity Act, 1910 is compoundable, the present petition is allowed.

8. Accordingly, FIR No.392/2021 dated 06.10.2021, and all proceedings emanating therefrom, are quashed.

SACHIN DATTA, J SEPTEMBER 24, 2026/cl

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 26/09/2026 at 11:15:20

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead