Delhi High Court
W.P.(C)/13876/2026 of KRISHNA KUMARI BHANDARI Vs DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT & ANR. on 24 September 2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010450602026 + W.P.(C) 13876/2026, CM APPL. 64899/2026 & CM APPL. 64900/2026 KRISHNA KUMARI BHANDARI .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Mumtaz Bhalla, Ms. Prapti Allagh, Mr Yash Mittal, Advs. versus DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT & ANR.
$~3 & 4
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
CNR No. DLHC010450602026
+
W.P.(C) 13876/2026, CM APPL. 64899/2026 & CM APPL.
64900/2026
KRISHNA KUMARI BHANDARI
.....Petitioner
Through:
Ms. Mumtaz Bhalla, Ms. Prapti
Allagh, Mr Yash Mittal, Advs.
versus
DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT & ANR.
.....Respondents
Through:
Mr. Vivek Gurnani, PC for ED
with Mr. Kanishk Maurya,
Advs.
Mr. Brijesh K. Tamber, Mr.
Vinay S. Bist, Ms. Chanchla
Tiwari & Mr. Dhimaan Dutta,
Advs. for R-2.
CNR No. DLHC010450682026
+
W.P.(C) 13881/2026 & CM APPL. 64914/2026, CM APPL.
64915/2026
SHILPA BHANDARI
.....Petitioner
Through:
Ms. Mumtaz Bhalla, Ms. Prapti
Allagh, Mr Yash Mittal, Advs.
versus
DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT & ORS.
.....Respondents
Through:
Mr. Vivek Gurnani, PC for ED
with Mr. Kanishk Maurya,
Advs.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJAN
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
%
24.09.2026
1. The present petitions were filed seeking setting aside of the directions passed by the Respondents and enabling de-freezing of This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 25/09/2026 at 12:10:55
bank accounts.
2. Mr. Vivek Gurnani, learned counsel for Directorate of Enforcement states that though initially accounts of petitioners were frozen, on account of some investigation, they have since been directed to be released. He submits that appropriate action, if any, in future would be taken in accordance with law.
3. Considering above, the present petitions have been rendered infructuous and they are disposed of accordingly.
4. Pending applications also stand disposed of.
5. A copy of the order passed today be kept in the connected matter. AMIT MAHAJAN, J SEPTEMBER 24, 2026 “SK” This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 25/09/2026 at 12:10:55