Delhi High Court

CRL.M.C./7163/2026 of NEERAJ JAIN AND ORS Vs THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. on 24 September 2026

Cites 2, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010458882026 + CRL.M.C. 7163/2026 NEERAJ JAIN AND ORS .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Amit Jain, Adv. versus THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Priyanka Dalal, APP for State. Mr. Rohit Tyagi and Ms. Mahima Tyagi, Advs.

$~63

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

CNR No. DLHC010458882026

+

CRL.M.C. 7163/2026

NEERAJ JAIN AND ORS

.....Petitioners

Through:

Mr. Amit Jain, Adv.

versus

THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR.

.....Respondents

Through:

Ms. Priyanka Dalal, APP for State.

Mr. Rohit Tyagi and Ms. Mahima

Tyagi, Advs. for R-2.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTA

%

24.09.2026

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

2

Decisions referred to

In this index

2

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

O R D E R

1. The application is disposed of with a direction to the petitioners to file certified copies of annexures before the next date of hearing. Crl.M.A. 29925/2026 (Exemption from filing certified copies of annexures)

2. The petitioners and the respondent no.2 jointly seek quashing of the FIR No.0345/2025, registered under Sections 498-A/406/34/354A/377/509 IPC (originally u/s 498-A/406/34) at P.S. Model Town, and subsequent proceedings emanating therefrom. CRL.M.C. 7163/2026

3. It is submitted that the parties have arrived at a settlement. The copy of the settlement dated 30.05.2026 (appended as Annexure P-2 to the present petition) has been placed on record.

4. It is stated that the parties have acted in terms thereof and withdrawn the proceedings filed by them against each other. This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 26/09/2026 at 11:15:19

5. In terms of the dicta laid down by Supreme Court in Gian Singh v. State of Punjab, (2012) 10 SCC 303 and Narinder Singh v. State of Punjab, (2014) 6 SCC 466, there is no impediment to allowing the present petition.

6. Learned APP for the State also does not oppose the present petition.

7. The concerned Investigating Officer (IO) has identified the parties.

8. Considering the circumstances, the present application is allowed.

9. Accordingly, FIR No.0345/2025 and subsequent proceedings emanating therefrom, stand quashed.

10. Needless to say, the right of the children who are not parties to the settlement, shall remain unaffected as a result of the said settlement.

SACHIN DATTA, J SEPTEMBER 24, 2026/cl

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 26/09/2026 at 11:15:19

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead