Delhi High Court
W.P.(C)/14116/2026 of RAMANDEEP KAUR Vs COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS A G & ANR. on 24 September 2026
HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010458622026 + W.P.(C) 14116/2026 & CM APPL. 66088/2026 RAMANDEEP KAUR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Devanshu Gupta & Mr. Pradeep Yadav, Advs. alongwith the petitioner. versus COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS A G & ANR. .....Respondents Through:
$~41
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
CNR No. DLHC010458622026
+
W.P.(C) 14116/2026 & CM APPL. 66088/2026
RAMANDEEP KAUR
.....Petitioner
Through:
Mr. Devanshu Gupta & Mr. Pradeep
Yadav,
Advs.
alongwith
the
petitioner.
versus
COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS A G & ANR. .....Respondents Through:
Ms. Anushree Narain, SSC with Mr.
Apurv Yadav, Adv.
Ms. Rupali Bandhopadhya, CGSC
with Mr. Amit Peswani, Ms. Amisha
Gupta & Mr. Abhijeet Kumar, Advs.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHAIL JAIN
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
%
24.09.2026
1. This petition is filed aggrieved of the order dated 31.03.2025 passed by respondent no.1/Commissioner of Customs (A & G) imposing a penalty of Rs.2,00,000/-.
2. During the course of the arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the appeal was preferred against the impugned order on 25.04.2025 and the hearing has not yet taken place.
3. In view of the above, this writ petition is disposed of. This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 28/09/2026 at 12:11:43
4. Considering the nature of the case, the allegations and that the penalty has been imposed upon the petitioner who is an athlete travelling along with the coach, let the appellate authority decide the appeal within six weeks from today.
5. Needless to say, the petitioner shall be at liberty to avail remedies if aggrieved of the decision.
6. It is clarified that this court has made no observations on the merits of the case.
AVNEESH JHINGAN, J
SHAIL JAIN, J SEPTEMBER 24, 2026 ‘JK’ This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 28/09/2026 at 12:11:43