Delhi High Court
CRL.REV.P.(NDPS)/31/2026 of LALIT AHUJA Vs STATE NCT OF DELHI on 23 September 2026
31/2026 Page 1 of 3 $~54 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 23.09.2026 # CNR No.DLHC010456622026 + LALIT AHUJA .....Petitioner CRL.REV.P.(NDPS) 31/2026, CRL.M.A. 29744/2026 Through: Mr. Mohd. Yasir, Adv. versus STATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Ms.
$~54
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
%
Date of Decision: 23.09.2026
CNR No.DLHC010456622026
+
LALIT AHUJA
.....Petitioner
CRL.REV.P.(NDPS) 31/2026, CRL.M.A. 29744/2026
Through:
Mr. Mohd. Yasir, Adv.
versus
STATE NCT OF DELHI
.....Respondent
Through:
Ms. Priyanka Dalal, APP for State.
SI Naveen, AGS (Crime Branch).
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTA
SACHIN DATTA, J. (ORAL)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The present revision has been filed by the petitioner who has been granted regular bail by the learned ASJ/Special Judge (NDPS), New Delhi, vide order dated 30.07.2025 in FIR No. 123/2025, PS Crime Branch, assails the order dated 19.08.2026 passed by the learned Special Judge (NDPS-09), Special Exclusive Court, New Delhi District, Rouse Avenue Court Complex, whereby the application of the petitioner seeking modification of the said bail order was dismissed as withdrawn.
2. The limited grievance canvassed by the petitioner is as regards the condition vide Paragraph 20 (v) of the order dated 30.07.2025 whereby bail was granted to the petitioner. The same reads as under:-
KUMAR PATEL
3. It is submitted that the petitioner is a resident of Ludhiana, Punjab and is required to travel every month to Delhi solely to comply with the aforesaid condition.
4. Learned APP for the State has been heard.
5. The object of the aforesaid condition was evidently to keep track of the whereabouts of the petitioner and to ensure his availability during trial.
6. The same object can be achieved without requiring the revisionist to travel from Ludhiana to Delhi every month.
7. It is acceded by the Investigating Officer that the petitioner has complied with the conditions regularly since his release and no allegation of misuse of liberty has been made against him.
8. Accordingly, the condition mentioned in Paragraph 20 (v) of the order dated 30.07.2025 is modified to the extent that instead of marking attendance at the concerned Police Station in Delhi every month, the petitioner shall mark his attendance on the first Monday of every month at the concerned Police Station within whose jurisdiction the petitioner resides at Ludhiana.
KUMAR PATEL
9. It shall be ensured that necessary intimation in this regard is also given by the petitioner to the concerned IO.
10. The concerned Police Station at Ludhiana shall also maintain a record with regard to the aforesaid and shall forward the report from time to time to the concerned IO.
11. All other conditions imposed vide order dated 30.07.2025 shall remain unaltered.
12. The petition is disposed of in the above terms.
SACHIN DATTA, J SEPTEMBER 23, 2026/r,sd
KUMAR PATEL