Delhi High Court
BAIL APPLN./2858/2026 of ABHISHEK @ LOVE Vs STATE (N.C.T. OF DELHI) on 23 September 2026
2858/2026 Page 1 of 2 pages $~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 23.09.2026 # CNR No. DLHC010318982026 + BAIL APPLN. 2858/2026 ABHISHEK @ LOVE .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Manoj Kumar Duggal and Mr. Aryan Duggal, Advocates versus STATE (N.C.T. OF DELHI)
Page 1 of 2 pages
$~3
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
%
Date of Decision: 23.09.2026
CNR No. DLHC010318982026
+
BAIL APPLN. 2858/2026
ABHISHEK @ LOVE
.....Petitioner
Through:
Mr. Manoj Kumar Duggal and Mr.
Aryan Duggal, Advocates
versus
STATE (N.C.T. OF DELHI)
.....Respondent
Through:
Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, APP for State
with SI Naveen Kumar
CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA
J U D G M E N T (ORAL)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The accused/applicant seeks regular bail in case FIR No. 435/2024 of PS Mahendra Park for offence under Section 109(1) of BNS.
2. The IO has not appeared, which reflects that the prosecution side is not seriously interested to oppose this bail application.
3. Broadly speaking, the allegation against the accused/applicant is that he inflicted stab injury in the abdomen of the injured Chand Mohd on 30.08.2024. According to prosecution, the alleged incident of stabbing GIRISH KATHPALIA Digitally signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI, 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec45569af39 62c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d15570996b4 0f80cbd2eee60402c487965ff801e26fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2026.09.23 16:55:15 +05'30' Digitally Signed By:RAHUL YADAV Signing Date:23.09.2026 17:00:23 Signature Not Verified
Page 2 of 2 pages occurred instantly in a public park.
4. Learned counsel for accused/applicant submits that he is in custody since 31.08.2024 and that the injured was discharged from the hospital on 07.09.2024. It is further submitted by learned counsel for accused/applicant that the charge was framed on 24.02.2025, but till date, only Chand Mohd has been examined in trial, that too only partly.
5. From the side of State, as mentioned above, the IO has not appeared. However, learned APP for State submits that his opposition to the bail application may be taken on record.
6. Considering the overall circumstances described above, I find no reason to deprive further liberty to the accused/applicant. Therefore, the bail application is allowed and accused/applicant is directed to be released on bail subject to his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.10,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court/Duty Magistrate.
7. A copy of this order be immediately transmitted to the concerned Jail Superintendent for informing the accused/applicant.
GIRISH KATHPALIA (JUDGE) SEPTEMBER 23, 2026/as GIRISH KATHPALIA Digitally signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI, 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec4 5569af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d155 70996b40f80cbd2eee60402c487965ff801e2 6fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2026.09.23 16:54:59 +05'30' Digitally Signed By:RAHUL YADAV Signing Date:23.09.2026 17:00:23 Signature Not Verified