Delhi High Court

W.P.(C)/4580/2024 of KESHAV DATT Vs SOUTH ASIAN UNIVERSITY on 23 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Page 1 of 2 $~84 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010165032024 + W.P.(C) 4580/2024 & CM APPL. 65565/2026 KESHAV DATT .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Abhik Chimni, Mr. Gurupal Singh, Mr. Pranjal Abrol, Ms. Moksha Sharma, Mr. Ayan Dasgupta, Advocates. versus SOUTH ASIAN

W.P.(C) 4580/2024

$~84

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

#

CNR No. DLHC010165032024

+

W.P.(C) 4580/2024 & CM APPL. 65565/2026

KESHAV DATT

.....Petitioner

Through:

Mr. Abhik Chimni, Mr. Gurupal

Singh,

Mr.

Pranjal

Abrol,

Ms.

Moksha

Sharma,

Mr.

Ayan

Dasgupta, Advocates.

versus

SOUTH ASIAN UNIVERSITY

.....Respondent

Through:

Mr. Purushottam Sharma Tripathi,

Mr. Prakhar Singh, Mr. Anuj Tyagi

&

Ms.

Shreelekha

Vyas,

Advocates.

CORAM:

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

O R D E R

% 23.09.2026 CM APPL. 65565/2026 (for withdrawal) & W.P.(C) 4580/2024

1. The petitioner has filed this application seeking permission to withdraw the captioned writ petition.

2. By way of the captioned petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution, the petitioner assails a decision dated 16.02.2024, by which his request for exercise of lien to the post held by him was declined by the respondent – South Asian University [“University”]. He also seeks a direction upon the University to allow him to exercise his lien and right to the post that was held by him. This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 25/09/2026 at 12:19:02

W.P.(C) 4580/2024

3. Mr. Abhik Chimni, learned counsel for the petitioner, states that the petitioner would like to approach the University for redressal of his grievance through the University’s grievance redressal mechanism.

4. Mr. Purushottam Sharma Tripathi, learned counsel for the University, has no objection to the aforesaid request, but clarifies that no settlement has yet been reached.

5. In view of the above, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to the parties to make an attempt to resolve the dispute inter se.

6. It is made clear that the rights and remedies of the petitioner remain reserved.

7. The next date of hearing, i.e. 07.01.2027, stands cancelled. PRATEEK JALAN, J SEPTEMBER 23, 2026 SS/SM/ This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 25/09/2026 at 12:19:02

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead