Delhi High Court

W.P.(C)/13987/2026 of MR SHUBHAM RAJPUT Vs BOXING FEDERATION OF INDIA & ORS. on 23 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010453632026 + W.P.(C) 13987/2026 & CM APPL. 65331/2026, CM APPL. 65332/2026 MR SHUBHAM RAJPUT .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Abhishek Gosain, Adv. (through VC) versus BOXING FEDERATION OF INDIA & ORS......Respondents Through: Ms. Vrinda

$~94

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

CNR No. DLHC010453632026

+

W.P.(C) 13987/2026 & CM APPL. 65331/2026, CM APPL.

65332/2026

MR SHUBHAM RAJPUT

.....Petitioner

Through:

Mr. Abhishek Gosain, Adv.

(through VC)

versus

BOXING FEDERATION OF INDIA & ORS ......Respondents Through:

Ms.

Vrinda

Bhandari

&

Mr. Ranjeet Pawar, Advs. for

R1

Mr. Ruchir Mishra, SPC & Mr.

Vikrant Malwal, GP with Mr.

Sanjeev Kumar Saxena, Mr.

Mukesh Kumar Tiwari, Ms.

Reba Jena Mishra & Ms.

Poonam Shukla, Advs. for R3

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJAN

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

O R D E R

%

23.09.2026

1. The petitioner is aggrieved by his provisional suspension by Respondent No. 1 - Boxing Federation of India. By notice dated 14.09.2026 (hereafter ‘the impugned notice’), the authorities on coming to a prima facie finding regarding discrepancy in the date of birth of the petitioner, while giving him opportunity to explain the same within a period of 14 days, provisionally suspended the petitioner from participating in any boxing events organised by Boxing Federation of India in future.

2. Undisputedly, by the impugned notice, the order of only an interim/provisional suspension has been passed and the petitioner has This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/09/2026 at 11:27:03

already been given an opportunity to explain the discrepancy.

3. Learned counsel for the respondent, who appears on advance service, submits that as and when the reply/ explanation is filed by the petitioner, final decision shall be taken, within one week thereafter.

4. Considering the above, the present petition is disposed of, granting liberty to the petitioner to file any additional reply/ documents to the impugned notice.

5. It is directed that as and when such reply/ document is filed by the petitioner, the respondent shall take the final decision, within one week thereafter.

6. Needless to say, the petitioner shall be at liberty to seek redressal afresh in case any grievance remains in future. AMIT MAHAJAN, J SEPTEMBER 23, 2026 “SS” This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/09/2026 at 11:27:03

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead