Delhi High Court

CRL.M.C./5570/2026 of BHUPENDRA TYAGI & ANR. Vs STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. on 23 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

5570/2026 Page 1 of 2 pages $~26 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 23.09.2026 # CNR No. DLHC010348682026 + CRL.M.C. 5570/2026 BHUPENDRA TYAGI & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Aditya Sharma, Advocate with petitioners. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR.

Page 1 of 2 pages

$~26

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

%

Date of Decision: 23.09.2026

CNR No. DLHC010348682026

+

CRL.M.C. 5570/2026

BHUPENDRA TYAGI & ANR.

.....Petitioners

Through:

Mr. Aditya Sharma, Advocate with

petitioners.

versus

STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR.

.....Respondents

Through:

Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, APP for State

with ASI Parveen Kumar and SI

Vikram Singh, PS Welcome.

Respondent no.2 in person.

CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA

J U D G M E N T (ORAL)

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.787/2023 of PS Welcome for offence under Section 323/506/341/34 IPC on the ground that complainant de facto (respondent no.2) has settled the disputes with the petitioners.

2. State has no objection to this petition. Statements of parties have already been recorded by the concerned Joint Registrar.

3. The respondent no.2 is present in court today and is identified by GIRISH KATHPALIA Digitally signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI, 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec 45569af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d1 5570996b40f80cbd2eee60402c487965ff80 1e26fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2026.09.23 16:58:21 +05'30' Digitally Signed By:RAHUL YADAV Signing Date:23.09.2026 17:00:23 Signature Not Verified

Page 2 of 2 pages IO/ASI Parveen Kumar. I have spoken with respondent no.2 in Hindi and it is stated by him that he has compromised all disputes with the petitioners, who are his paternal uncle and cousin. Respondent no.2 submits that now he does not wish to continue prosecution of petitioners since now all of them are living peacefully.

4. Having spoken with respondent no.2, I am satisfied that it would be in the interest of justice not to push the parties through full dress trial.

5. Therefore, the petition is allowed and FIR No.787/2023 of PS Welcome for offence under Section 323/506/341/34 IPC as well as proceedings arising out of the same are quashed.

GIRISH KATHPALIA (JUDGE) SEPTEMBER 23, 2026/dr GIRISH KATHPALIA Digitally signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI, 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afe c45569af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d1 5570996b40f80cbd2eee60402c487965ff8 01e26fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2026.09.23 16:58:10 +05'30' Digitally Signed By:RAHUL YADAV Signing Date:23.09.2026 17:00:23 Signature Not Verified

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead