Delhi High Court

W.P.(C)/95/2022 of SWARAJ SARKAR Vs UNIVERSITY OF DELHI & ORS. on 23 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Page 1 of 2 $~5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010415502021 + W.P.(C) 95/2022 SWARAJ SARKAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Bhanu Gupta, Advocate versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Ritik Dwivedi & Mr. Dharitry Phookan, Advocates for R-1.

$~5

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

#

CNR No. DLHC010415502021

+

W.P.(C) 95/2022

SWARAJ SARKAR

.....Petitioner

Through:

Mr. Bhanu Gupta, Advocate

versus

UNIVERSITY OF DELHI & ORS.

.....Respondent

Through:

Mr. Ritik Dwivedi & Mr. Dharitry

Phookan, Advocates for R-1.

Mr.

Romy

Chacko,

Senior

Advocate with Mr. Sachin Singh

Dalal, Advocate for R-2.

CORAM:

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

O R D E R

% 23.09.2026

1. By way of the present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, the petitioner seeks quashing of the order dated 01.09.2020, whereby the major penalty of dismissal from service was imposed upon him. The petitioner further seeks a direction to the respondents to reconsider the quantum of punishment in light of his service record and the circumstances set out in his various representations and, in the event of his reinstatement, to grant him all consequential benefits.

2. After some arguments, Mr. Bhanu Gupta, learned counsel for the petitioner, upon instructions, seeks permission to withdraw the present This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 25/09/2026 at 12:25:32

petition with liberty to file a representation before respondent No. 2 – Jesus and Mary College [“the College”] seeking reconsideration of the quantum of penalty imposed upon the petitioner.

3. The petition, alongwith any pending applications, is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as aforesaid.

4. It is made clear that this Court has expressed no opinion on the merits of the matter. The College shall be at liberty to consider the representation, if filed, and take such decision thereon, in its own discretion. PRATEEK JALAN, J SEPTEMBER 23, 2026 ‘pv’/SD/ This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 25/09/2026 at 12:25:32

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead