Delhi High Court

W.P.(C)/13826/2026 of BALESHWARI & ORS. Vs THE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. on 21 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Page 1 of 2 $~115 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010449772026 + W.P.(C) 13826/2026 BALESHWARI & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Rajat Kaushik, Advocate. versus THE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Harsh Kumar Pandey and Mr. Sujeet

$~115

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

#

CNR No. DLHC010449772026

+

W.P.(C) 13826/2026

BALESHWARI & ORS.

.....Petitioners

Through:

Mr. Rajat Kaushik, Advocate.

versus

THE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS.

.....Respondents

Through:

Mr. Harsh Kumar Pandey and Mr.

Sujeet Kumar Mishra, Advocates

for R-1.

CORAM:

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

O R D E R

% 21.09.2026

1. By way of the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, the petitioners, inter alia, seek directions to the respondents to compute and pay the arrears of pay and allowances payable in respect of Late Sh. Rakesh, representing the difference between the daily wages actually paid to him and the pay admissible in the regular pay scale of Rs. 2550-3200, as revised from time to time vide Office Order dated 30.03.2022, alongwith interest @ 18% per annum. The petitioners also seek payment of the consequential benefits arising from his posthumous regularisation.

2. The disputes raised in the present petition concern service-related entitlements of the predecessor-in-interest of the petitioners, who was This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 23/09/2026 at 11:13:52

employed by the Municipal Corporation of Delhi [“MCD”]. MCD, however, is a notified entity for the purposes of the jurisdiction of the Central Administrative Tribunal [“the Tribunal”].

3. Mr. Rajat Kaushik, learned counsel for the petitioners, therefore, seeks permission to withdraw the present petition, with liberty to approach the Tribunal.

4. The petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as aforesaid. PRATEEK JALAN, J SEPTEMBER 21, 2026 SS/SD/ This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 23/09/2026 at 11:13:52

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead