Delhi High Court

W.P.(C)/13912/2026 of M/S DEEWAN PALACE Vs DELHI POLLUTION CONTROL COMMITTEE & ORS. on 21 September 2026

Cites 1, Cited by 0

& W.P.(C) 13912/2026 Page 1 of 3 $~133 & 135 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010451022026 + W.P.(C) 13907/2026 & CM APPL. 64977/2026 M/S PARADISE GREEN GARDEN .....Petitioner Through: Dr. Anil K. Aggarwal, Prof. Madan Mohan, Mr. B.N. Sharma, Advs. versus

$~133 & 135

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

CNR No. DLHC010451022026

+

W.P.(C) 13907/2026 & CM APPL. 64977/2026

M/S PARADISE GREEN GARDEN

.....Petitioner

Through:

Dr. Anil K. Aggarwal, Prof.

Madan

Mohan,

Mr.

B.N.

Sharma, Advs.

versus

DELHI POLLUTION CONTROL COMMITTEE & ORS.

.....Respondents

Through:

Mr. Kul Anand, Adv. for R-2.

Ms. Shivani Luthra Lohiya, Mr.

Nitin Saluja & Ms. Vasudha

Singh, Advs. for R-3.

CNR No. DLHC010451082026

+

W.P.(C) 13912/2026 & CM APPL. 64989/2026

M/S DEEWAN PALACE

.....Petitioner

Through:

Dr. Anil K. Aggarwal, Prof.

Madan

Mohan,

Mr.

B.N.

Sharma, Advs.

versus

DELHI POLLUTION CONTROL COMMITTEE & ORS.

.....Respondents

Through:

Mr. Balendu Shekhar, Mr.

Krishna

Chaitanya,

Mr.

Divyansh Singh & Mr. Raj

Kumar Maurya, Advs. for R-1.

Mr. Saroj Bidawat, SC for

MCD.

Mr. Siddhant Nath, Adv. for R-

3.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJAN

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

1

Decisions referred to

In this index

1

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

O R D E R

%

21.09.2026

1. By the present petitions, the petitioners seek following reliefs: “I. Issue a Writ of Certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order, or direction to Quash and Set Aside the impugned i) the Show Cause Notice for Closure (File No. DPCC/(10)(02)/(63)/Leg-25/482-83), ii) the Show Cause Notice for Imposition of Environmental Compensation (File No. DPCC/(10)(02)/(63)/Leg-25/484-85), iii) Show Cause Notice for Imposition of Environment Compensation for non-complaint DG Set (File No. DPCC/(10)(02)/(63)/Leg-25/486-87), all dated 11.08.2026 issued by Respondent No. 1; and

II. Issue a Writ of Mandamus directing Respondent No. 2 (MCD) and Respondent No. 3 (DJB) to immediately fulfil their constitutional and statutory obligations by laying trunk sewer lines and providing municipal piped water supply in the Bijwasan area; and

III. Direct Respondent No. 1 to grant a Provisional Consent to Operate (CTO) to the Petitioner, tailored for setups relying on septic tanks, valid until functional municipal infrastructure is commissioned; and

IV. Pass such other and further orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case. And “I. Issue a Writ of Certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order, or direction to Quash and Set Aside the impugned i) the Show Cause Notice for Closure (File No. DPCC/(10)(02)/(63)/Leg-25/416-17), ii) the Show Cause Notice for Imposition of Environmental Compensation (File No. DPCC/(10)(02)/(63)/Leg-25/418-19) both dated 11.08.2026 issued by Respondent No. 1; and

II. Issue a Writ of Mandamus directing Respondent No. 2 (MCD) and Respondent No. 3 (DJB) to immediately fulfil their constitutional and statutory obligations by laying trunk sewer lines and providing municipal piped water supply in the Bijwasan area; and

III. Direct Respondent No. 1 to grant a Provisional Consent to Operate (CTO) to the Petitioner, tailored for setups relying on septic tanks, valid until functional municipal infrastructure is commissioned; and

IV. Pass such other and further orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.”

2. It is the grievance of the petitioners that they have been issued Show Cause Notices indicating proposed actions which are barred by the law laid down by the Hon’ble Apex Court in Delhi Pollution

Control Committee v. Lodhi Property Co. Ltd. etc.: (2026) 2 SCC

670.

3. Be that as it may, the petitioners have already filed their respective replies to the Show Cause Notices and the final order is yet to be passed.

4. It remains undisputed that the respondent authorities are bound by the law laid down by Constitutional Courts. It is, therefore, expected that any order that may be passed would adhere to the law laid down by the Courts from time to time. The present petition only on apprehension that the respondents would pass a final order without considering the applicable law is therefore, premature.

5. The respondent authorities are directed to consider the reply of the petitioner and take a decision in accordance with applicable laws.

6. The petitioner would be at liberty to take recourse to further proceedings in case any grievance remains in future.

7. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the allegations made by the respondent authorities and the reply filed by the petitioner in that regard.

8. The petitions are disposed of in the aforesaid manner.

9. Pending application(s) also stands disposed of.

10. A copy of the order passed today be kept in the connected matter. AMIT MAHAJAN, J SEPTEMBER 21, 2026 “SK”

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead