Delhi High Court
CONT.CAS(C)/1729/2026 of SURINDER SINGH Vs SHRI GOVIND MOHAN SECRETARY & ORS. on 18 September 2026
HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010445382026 + CONT.CAS(C) 1729/2026 SURINDER SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Abhay Kumar Bhargava, Mr. Ajinkya and Mr. Nikhel Kumar, Advs. versus SHRI GOVIND MOHAN SECRETARY & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Vikrant Nilesh Goyal, Mr.
$~51
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
#
CNR No. DLHC010445382026
+
CONT.CAS(C) 1729/2026
SURINDER SINGH
.....Petitioner
Through:
Mr. Abhay Kumar Bhargava, Mr.
Ajinkya
and
Mr.
Nikhel
Kumar,
Advs.
versus
SHRI GOVIND MOHAN SECRETARY & ORS. .....Respondents Through:
Mr.
Vikrant
Nilesh
Goyal,
Mr.
Inderpreet Singh, Mr. Kunal Dixit and
Ms. Monika, Advs.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
% 18.09.2026
1. The present petition has been filed alleging wilful disobedience of the order dated 09th July, 2024, passed by a Division Bench of this Court in W.P.(C) 3310/2022 and other connected matters, wherein, directions were given to the respondents to hold the Departmental Promotion Committee (“DPC”) in respect of the petitioner’s promotion to the post of Deputy Commandant/Junior Aircraft Maintenance Engineer, within a period of three months, from today.
2. In response, learned counsel appearing for the respondents has handed over to this Court a copy of order dated 21st October, 2024, passed by a Division Bench of this Court, in W.P.(C) 14719/2024, which is reproduced as under: “ ”
3. By referring to the aforesaid order, learned counsel appearing for the respondents submits that though, the DPC was held, but since the same was subject to the outcome of the said writ petition, it was not communicated to the petitioner herein.
4. He has handed over to this Court a copy of decision of the DPC which was held on 10th November, 2024. The same reproduced as below:
“ ”
5. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent submits that no speaking order was passed by the respondents in view of the said order dated 21st October, 2024, in W.P.(C) 14719/2024, as the said writ petition pertains to the same set of people as the petitioner for the purposes of promotion.
6. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents further submits that a speaking order shall now be passed and the same shall be communicated to the petitioner, within a period of three weeks, from today.
7. Upon receipt of the order from the respondents, the petitioner shall be at liberty to challenge the same in accordance with law.
8. Noting the aforesaid, the present petition is disposed of. MINI PUSHKARNA, J SEPTEMBER 18, 2026/KR