Delhi High Court
CONT.CAS(C)/602/2026 of VISHNU MENARIA Vs THE STATE NCT OF DELHI & ORS. on 18 September 2026
$~18 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010148042026 + CONT.CAS(C) 602/2026 VISHNU MENARIA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Piyush Ranjan, Adv. (Through VC) versus THE STATE NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Niraj Kumar, Senior Central Govt. Counsel with Mr.
$~18
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
#
CNR No. DLHC010148042026
+
CONT.CAS(C) 602/2026
VISHNU MENARIA
.....Petitioner
Through:
Mr. Piyush Ranjan, Adv. (Through
VC)
versus
THE STATE NCT OF DELHI & ORS.
.....Respondents
Through:
Mr. Niraj Kumar, Senior Central Govt.
Counsel with Mr. Chaitanya Kumar,
Advocate, and Mr. Pankaj Kumar,
Inspector and Mr. Manish, SI, PS
Hazrat Nizamuddin for Delhi Police.
Mob: 9810020341
Email:
advocateniraj2009@gmail.com
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
1
Decisions referred to
In this index
1
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
% 18.09.2026
1. The present petition has been filed alleging wilful disobedience of the binding directions of the Hon’ble Supreme Court, in the case of Arnesh Kumar Versus. State of Bihar and Another, (2014) 8 SCC 273.
2. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents is present along with the respondent nos. 3 and 4.
3. The said respondents tender their unconditional apology before this Court.
4. Attention of this Court is also drawn to the order dated 16th January, 2026, passed by a Division Bench of this Court in CONT.CAS.(CRL.) 19/2025, titled as Court on its Motion Versus Pankaj Kumar and Anr., wherein, directions were issued in the following manner: “ ”
5. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents submits that the aforesaid case dealt by the Division Bench pertained to the same First Information Report (“FIR”) as in the present case, i.e., FIR 237/2025.
6. It is submitted that since the Division Bench has already accepted the apology and has closed contempt reference, the present petition be also disposed of in that account.
7. Considering the submissions made before this Court, the Court accepts the unconditional apology made on behalf of the respondents.
8. The present petition is accordingly disposed of, noting the aforesaid. MINI PUSHKARNA, J SEPTEMBER 18, 2026/SK