Delhi High Court
CONT.CAS(C)/1710/2026 of SANJAY GUPTA Vs ANSHU GUPTA on 17 September 2026
$~9 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010440042026 + CONT.CAS(C) 1710/2026 SANJAY GUPTA .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Sonali Chopra, Advocate. (M): 9999728767 versus ANSHU GUPTA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Udit Dedhiya, SC with Mr. Krishna Dutta Multani, ASC, Mr. Preyansh
$~9
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
#
CNR No. DLHC010440042026
+
CONT.CAS(C) 1710/2026
SANJAY GUPTA
.....Petitioner
Through:
Ms. Sonali Chopra, Advocate.
(M): 9999728767
versus
ANSHU GUPTA
.....Respondent
Through:
Mr. Udit Dedhiya, SC with Mr.
Krishna Dutta Multani, ASC, Mr.
Preyansh Gupta, Mr. Arihant
Shrivardhan, Advocates for
respondent no. 1/NDMC.
(M): 9619444355
Email: uditdedhiyaoffice@gmail.com
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
% 17.09.2026
1. The present petition has been filed alleging wilful disobedience of the order dated 23rd July, 2026, passed by this Court in W.P.(C) 6568/2026, whereby, the New Delhi Municipal Council (“NDMC”) was directed to decide the petitioner’s application for repair and renovation of the property bearing no. E-27/4 (Ground Floor), Middle Circle, Connaught Place, New Delhi–110001, by passing a reasoned order, within two weeks.
2. Today, learned counsel appearing for the respondent NDMC has handed over to this Court an order dated 16th September, 2026. This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 21/09/2026 at 11:02:14
3. He submits that the said order is a Speaking Order that has been passed pursuant to the directions in the order dated 23rd July, 2026, as aforesaid. The Speaking Order dated 16th September, 2026, is taken on record.
4. Per contra, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner disputes the aforesaid submission and submits that the purported order dated 16th September, 2026, passed by the respondent NDMC is not a Speaking Order in terms of the directions passed by this Court.
5. That be the case, if the petitioner is aggrieved by the Speaking Order passed by the respondent-NDMC, the petitioner is at liberty to seek remedies, in accordance with law.
6. Noting the aforesaid, the present petition is accordingly, disposed of. MINI PUSHKARNA, J SEPTEMBER 17, 2026 c This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 21/09/2026 at 11:02:14