Delhi High Court

W.P.(CRL)/2867/2026 of MITHILESH KUMAR JHA Vs STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. on 17 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Page 1 of 2 $~102 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010440932026 + W.P.(CRL) 2867/2026 & CRL.M.As. 28785-28787/2026 MITHILESH KUMAR JHA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ashish Chauhan, and Mr. Balender Mishra, Advocates. versus STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR.

W.P.(CRL) 2867/2026 Page 1 of 2

$~102

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

CNR No. DLHC010440932026

+

W.P.(CRL) 2867/2026 & CRL.M.As. 28785-28787/2026

MITHILESH KUMAR JHA

.....Petitioner

Through:

Mr. Ashish Chauhan, and Mr.

Balender Mishra, Advocates.

versus

STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR.

.....Respondents

Through:

Mr. Amol Sinha, ASC with Mr.

Kshitiz Garg, Mr. Ashvini Kumar,

Mr. Gourav Singh, and Ms. Chavi

Lazarus, Advocates.

SI Shiksha, PS Dwarka South.

Ms. Pratima N Lakra, and Mr.

Shailendra

Kumar

Mishra,

Advocates for R2.

CORAM:

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

O R D E R

%

17.09.2026

1. By way of this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, the petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No. 150/2026, dated 16.06.2026, registered at Police Station Dwarka South, District Dwarka, Delhi, under Sections 420/406/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

2. At the very outset, Mr. Amol Sinha, learned Additional Standing Counsel, states that the subject FIR is still at the stage of investigation, and no chargesheet has yet been filed. This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 19/09/2026 at 11:58:16

W.P.(CRL) 2867/2026 Page 2 of 2

3. After some arguments, Mr. Ashish Chauhan, learned counsel for the petitioner, seeks permission to withdraw this petition, without prejudice to the rights and remedies available to the petitioner at the appropriate stage before the Trial Court, including at the stage of arguments on charge/discharge application, in the event a chargesheet is filed.

4. The petition, alongwith pending applications, is dismissed as withdrawn, in view of the aforesaid.

5. Mr. Chauhan, states that, in the meanwhile, the petitioner and respondent No. 2 are attempting to settle their disputes.

6. Needless to say, if the disputes are ultimately settled between the parties, it will be open to them to initiate appropriate proceedings in that regard, which will be decided on their own merits. It is clarified that this Court has not made any observation on the merits of the case, and all rights and contentions of the parties are left open in accordance with law before the Trial Court. PRATEEK JALAN, J SEPTEMBER 17, 2026 tg/MK/ This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 19/09/2026 at 11:58:16

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead