Delhi High Court
O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.)/731/2026 of SHREE HOSPITAL EQUIPMENTS Vs ACTION CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT LIMITED on 17 September 2026
HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010440562026 + O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 731/2026 SHREE HOSPITAL EQUIPMENTS .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Neeraj Gupta and Mr. Rajat Asija, Advs. versus ACTION CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT LIMITED .....Respondent Through: Ms. Surbhi Singh, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE
$~67
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
CNR No. DLHC010440562026
+
O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 731/2026
SHREE HOSPITAL EQUIPMENTS
.....Petitioner
Through:
Mr. Neeraj Gupta and Mr. Rajat
Asija, Advs.
versus
ACTION CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT LIMITED
.....Respondent
Through:
Ms. Surbhi Singh, Adv.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
1
Decisions referred to
In this index
1
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
%
17.09.2026
1. The present Petition under Section 29A(4) & (5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 has been filed by the Petitioner for extending the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal.
2. Material on record indicates that an Arbitral Tribunal was constituted by this Court vide Order dated 04.01.2024 in ARB.P.1222/2023. The mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal is being extended from time to time and last such extension was granted by this Court vide Order dated 10.01.2025 in O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 15/2026 by which this Court had extended the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal till 31.07.2026. Since the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal has expired on 31.07.2026, the present petition has been filed for extending the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal.
3. It is stated that the matter is at the final stage in as much as the This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 19/09/2026 at 11:36:28
Claimant’s arguments have been concluded and the Respondent has to commence its arguments and, therefore, the mandate of the Arbitrator be extended.
4. Learned Counsel appearing for the Respondent on advance notice states that the Respondent does not have any objection to the present Petition.
5. The Apex Court in Rohan Builders (India) Private Limited v. Berger Paints India Limited, 2024 SCC OnLine SC 2494, has held that an application for extension of the time period for passing an arbitral award under Section 29A(4) read with Section 29A(5) is maintainable even after the expiry of the twelve-month or the extended six-month period, as the case may be.
6. In view of the facts of the present case, this Court is inclined to regularize the period from 31.07.2026 till today and extend the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal till 31.01.2027, so that the award can be pronounced.
7. The petition is disposed of, along with the pending applications, if any. SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD, J SEPTEMBER 17, 2026 Rahul This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 19/09/2026 at 11:36:28