Delhi High Court
CRL.M.C./5224/2026 of STATE NCT OF DELHI Vs RAJEEV @ RAJEEV ARORA on 17 September 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010331382026 + CRL.M.C. 5224/2026 STATE NCT OF DELHI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Manoj Pant, APP with Mr. Varun Kumar, Ms. Suman and Ms. Priyanka Tyagi, Advs. SI Sanjay Kumar. versus RAJEEV @ RAJEEV ARORA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Arav
$~17 to 21
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
#
CNR No. DLHC010331382026
+
CRL.M.C. 5224/2026
STATE NCT OF DELHI
.....Petitioner
Through:
Mr. Manoj Pant, APP with Mr. Varun
Kumar, Ms. Suman and Ms. Priyanka
Tyagi, Advs.
SI Sanjay Kumar.
versus
RAJEEV @ RAJEEV ARORA
.....Respondent
Through:
Mr. Arav Pandit and Ms. Roohe Hina
Dua, Advs.
~18
#
CNR No. DLHC010331412026
+
CRL.M.C. 5230/2026
STATE
.....Petitioner
Through:
Mr. Manoj Pant, APP with Mr. Varun
Kumar, Ms. Suman and Ms. Priyanka
Tyagi, Advs.
SI Sanjay Kumar.
versus
FARIS ARORA
.....Respondent
Through:
Mr. Arav Pandit and Ms. Roohe Hina
Dua, Advs.
~19
#
CNR No. DLHC010331402026
+
CRL.M.C. 5232/2026
STATE
.....Petitioner
Through:
Mr. Manoj Pant, APP with Mr. Varun
Kumar, Ms. Suman and Ms. Priyanka
Tyagi, Advs.
SI Sanjay Kumar.
versus
SHWETA
.....Respondent
Through:
Mr. Arav Pandit and Ms. Roohe Hina
Dua, Advs.
~20
#
CNR No. DLHC010333132026
+
CRL.M.C. 5320/2026
STATE
.....Petitioner
Through:
Mr. Manoj Pant, APP with Mr. Varun
Kumar, Ms. Suman and Ms. Priyanka
Tyagi, Advs.
SI Sanjay Kumar.
versus
PANKAJ KUMAR @ PANKAJ ARORA @ PANKAJ RANGEELA
.....Respondent
Through:
Mr. Arav Pandit and Ms. Roohe Hina
Dua, Advs.
~21
#
CNR No. DLHC010337442026
+
CRL.M.C. 5354/2026
STATE
.....Petitioner
Through:
Mr. Manoj Pant, APP with Mr. Varun
Kumar, Ms. Suman and Ms. Priyanka
Tyagi, Advs.
SI Sanjay Kumar.
versus
RAMA ARORA
.....Respondent
Through:
Mr. Arav Pandit and Ms. Roohe Hina
Dua, Advs.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MADHU JAIN
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
% 17.09.2026
1. This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode.
2. Learned APP for the State submits that during the pendency of the present petition, FIR No. 206/2026 registered at Police Station Laxmi Nagar, District East, Delhi, for offences punishable under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 303(2), 351 read with Section 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023
[hereinafter referred to as ‘BNS’] which forms the subject matter of the present proceedings, has been quashed by this Court vide order dated 25.08.2026 passed in CRL.M.C. 6319/2026, on the basis of Settlement Agreement dated 06.08.2026. That the parties had resolved their disputes arising out of the cross-cases and had agreed not to pursue the respective FIRs. Accordingly, FIR No. 206/2026 and all consequential proceedings emanating therefrom were quashed.
3. In view of the aforesaid, learned APP for the State submits that nothing further survives for consideration in the present petition.
4. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of as infructuous.
5. Pending application(s), if any, also stand(s) disposed of.
6. The order be uploaded on the website forthwith. MADHU JAIN, J SEPTEMBER 17, 2026/JYH/PG