Delhi High Court

CONT.CAS(C)/1727/2026 of RAKESH GUPTA Vs SANJIV KUMAR SINGH & ORS. on 17 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010443522026 + CONT.CAS(C) 1727/2026 RAKESH GUPTA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Vineet Bhagat and Mr. Aksveer S. Saggu, Advocates Mob: 9810209570 Email: vineetbhagataor@gmail.com versus SANJIV KUMAR SINGH & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Rakesh

$~109

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

#

CNR No. DLHC010443522026

+

CONT.CAS(C) 1727/2026

RAKESH GUPTA

.....Petitioner

Through:

Mr. Vineet Bhagat and Mr. Aksveer

S. Saggu, Advocates

Mob: 9810209570

Email: vineetbhagataor@gmail.com

versus

SANJIV KUMAR SINGH & ORS.

.....Respondents

Through:

Mr. Rakesh Malhotra, Mr. Bharat

Malhotra and Ms. Gayatri Bhatia,

Advocates for MCD

Mob: 8447151507

Email: bharatmal2@gmail.com

CORAM:

HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

O R D E R

% 17.09.2026

1. The present petition has been filed alleging wilful disobedience of the order dated 18th August, 2026, passed in W.P.(C) 6141/2026, wherein, this Court had directed that the property of the petitioner shall be de-sealed since the entire unauthorised construction had been removed by the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (“MCD”).

2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the needful had to be done by the respondents-MCD herein, within a period of one week.

3. However, he submits that the property in question, i.e., 6016, Gali This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 22/09/2026 at 10:48:27

Arya Samaj, Naya Bans, Khari Baoli, Delhi-110006, has still not been de- sealed.

4. In response, learned counsel appearing for the respondents-MCD, on instructions, submits that the property in question has been de-sealed today morning, at around 09:40 AM.

5. Accordingly, no further orders are required to be passed in the present petition.

6. Noting the aforesaid, the present petition is disposed of. MINI PUSHKARNA, J SEPTEMBER 17, 2026 ak This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 22/09/2026 at 10:48:27

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead