Delhi High Court
CONT.CAS(C)/1722/2026 of PAYAL GUPTA Vs URMILA DEVI on 17 September 2026
HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010443462026 + CONT.CAS(C) 1722/2026 & CM APPL. 63858/2026 PAYAL GUPTA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Divakar Upadhyaya, Adv. versus URMILA DEVI .....Respondent Through: None CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA O R D E R % 17.09.2026 CM APPL.
$~104
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
#
CNR No. DLHC010443462026
+
CONT.CAS(C) 1722/2026 & CM APPL. 63858/2026
PAYAL GUPTA
.....Petitioner
Through:
Mr. Divakar Upadhyaya, Adv.
versus
URMILA DEVI
.....Respondent
Through:
None
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
% 17.09.2026 CM APPL. 63858/2026 (For exemption)
1. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
2. The application accordingly stands disposed of. CONT.CAS(C) 1722/2026
3. The present petition has been filed alleging wilful disobedience of the Statement dated 27th October, 2021, made by the respondent and recorded in the order dated 27th October, 2021, passed by the Additional District Judge (Central), Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi in CS DJ 270/2021, titled as Mrs. Payal Gupta Versus Urmila Devi.
4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner herein had earlier filed the suit being CS DJ 270/2021 for recovery of possession, declaration, permanent and mandatory injunction in respect of the suit property, in which the respondent herein was made a defendant.
5. It is submitted that in the said suit, a statement was made on behalf of the respondent herein in the following manner:
6. He submits that despite the aforesaid statement, a suit bearing CS DJ 1052/2024 for partition, possession and permanent injunction has been filed by the respondent in respect of the suit property against the petitioner.
7. However, the aforesaid contention of the petitioner cannot be accepted. Any statement made by any party would not bind a party to not seek its remedies, in accordance with law.
8. Therefore, no merit is found in the present petition.
9. The present petition is accordingly disposed of. MINI PUSHKARNA, J SEPTEMBER 17, 2026/KR