Delhi High Court
CONT.CAS(C)/1632/2026 of DINESH SAINI Vs YASH PAL & ANR. on 17 September 2026
of 5 $~39 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 17.09.2026 # CNR No. DLHC010422532026 + CONT.CAS(C) 1632/2026 DINESH SAINI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Madhav K. Sareen and Mr. Raunak Wahi, Advocates Email: madhavksareen@gmail.com Mob: 9871909309 versus YASH PAL & ANR.
$~39
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
%
Date of Decision: 17.09.2026
CNR No. DLHC010422532026
+
CONT.CAS(C) 1632/2026
DINESH SAINI
.....Petitioner
Through:
Mr. Madhav K. Sareen and Mr.
Raunak Wahi, Advocates
Email: madhavksareen@gmail.com
Mob: 9871909309
versus
YASH PAL & ANR.
.....Respondents
Through:
Mr. Abhinav Singh and Ms. Pearl
Khurana, Advocates
Mob: 9811188892
Email: abhinavsinghadv@gmail.com
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA
MINI PUSHKARNA, J. (ORAL):
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The present petition has been filed alleging wilful disobedience of the order dated 27th March, 2023, passed by the Principal District & Sessions Judge, North-West District, Rohini Courts, Delhi, in Contempt Petition (Crl.) 01/2023, and the order dated 13th August, 2024, passed by this Court in CRL.M.C. 3429/2023.
2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that earlier, a complaint had been filed by one Mr. Raj Babu Dvivedy and Mr. Vanshraj, with regard to the Other Backward Class (“OBC”) Certificate issued in favour of Ms. Devika Saini, i.e., the daughter of the petitioner.
3. However, the said OBC Certificate issued in favour of the daughter of the petitioner was found to be genuine.
4. Attention of this Court has been drawn to the order dated 27th March, 2023, passed in Contempt Petition (Crl.) 01/2023, wherein, it was noted as follows: “xxx xxx xxx ”
5. By referring to the aforesaid, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the Trial Court had taken note of the fact that on account of the Status Report filed on behalf of the Assistant Sub-Inspector (“ASI”), Police Station (“PS”) Maurice Nagar, Delhi, the OBC Certificate issued in favour of Ms. Devika Saini, was found to be genuine.
6. He further draws the attention of this Court to the order dated 13th August, 2024, passed by this Court in CRL.M.C. 3429/2023, wherein, it has been held as follows: “xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx”
7. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has again received a notice dated 18th June, 2026, from the Sub Divisional Magistrate (“SDM”) Patel Nagar, Government of NCT of Delhi (“GNCTD”), on the basis of a fresh complaint/representation on behalf of respondent no. 2, i.e., Mr. Vanshraj, the same person, who had filed the earlier complaint, with respect to the validity of the OBC Certificate of his daughter.
8. The said notice, as received by the petitioner, is reproduced as under: “ ”
9. In response, learned counsel appearing for the respondent has handed over a copy of Status Report dated 16th September, 2026, which is taken on record.
10. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent submits that the notice dated 18th June, 2026, issued by the Sub-Divisional Magistrate (“SDM”), Patel Nagar, GNCTD, has been withdrawn vide order dated 15th September, 2026, issued by the office of SDM, Patel Nagar, GNCTD.
11. Accordingly, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the grievance of the petitioner stands satisfied.
12. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of.
MINI PUSHKARNA, J SEPTEMBER 17, 2026 ak