Delhi High Court

W.P.(CRL)/2845/2026 of SXXXXX YXXXX Vs THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR on 16 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

2845/2026 Page 1 of 3 pages $~73 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 16.09.2026 # CNR No. DLHC010437902026 + W.P.(CRL) 2845/2026 SXXXXX YXXXX .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Dinesh Kumar and Mr. Jai Subhash Thakur, Advocates. versus THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR

$~73

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

%

Date of Decision: 16.09.2026

CNR No. DLHC010437902026

+

W.P.(CRL) 2845/2026

SXXXXX YXXXX

.....Petitioner

Through:

Mr. Dinesh Kumar and Mr. Jai

Subhash Thakur, Advocates.

versus

THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR

.....Respondents

Through:

Mr. Anand V Khatri, ASC with ASI

Hans Kumar.

CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA

J U D G M E N T (ORAL)

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. For convenience, prayer clause of the petition is extracted below:

(a) To Direct the S.H.O. of P.S. of Ashok Vihar through DCP of North West District to expedite the complaint given through S.P. No. ED495407416IN, Dated 10/08/2026 of the petitioner.

(b) To Direct the S.H.O. of P.S. of Ashok Vihar through DCP of North West District to provide protection to the petitioner.

(c) Pass any further order as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit, just and proper in the present facts and circumstances of the case in the interest of justice.

2. Learned counsel for petitioner, on being called upon to address preliminary submissions, especially on the first prayer of the petition, GIRISH KATHPALIA

2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec45569af 3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d15570996 b40f80cbd2eee60402c487965ff801e26fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2026.09.16 17:11:34 +05'30'

submits that earlier the petitioner repeatedly went to PS Ashok Vihar but her complaint was not accepted, so she had no option but to send the same through Speed Post.

3. Further, in response to a specific query, it is stated by learned counsel for petitioner that the complaint in question was lodged by the petitioner (mother of the alleged victim) against her father-in-law. It is also apprised by learned counsel for petitioner that the petitioner (mother of the alleged victim) is already embroiled in matrimonial litigation with her husband, who is son of the accused.

4. Learned ASC, assisted by IO/ASI Hans Kumar from PS Ashok Vihar, appearing on advance intimation submits that despite being repeatedly requested, the petitioner has not been coming forward to make her statement in enquiry. It is submitted that since the petitioner is already embroiled in matrimonial litigation with her husband and keeping in mind the recent trend of lodging false complaints of sexual misconduct against close relatives of the husband, an enquiry was considered necessary before registering the FIR. It is also submitted by learned ASC that the accused is aged above 70 years.

5. In view of above circumstances, since the petitioner herself has not been coming forward to join enquiry and make statement, there cannot be an occasion to direct expeditious action on her complaint. The present petition can also be not treated as a petition for direction to the police to register FIR, because it is settled law that writ jurisdiction cannot be invoked to direct GIRISH KATHPALIA

2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec45 569af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d1557 0996b40f80cbd2eee60402c487965ff801e26fa , cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2026.09.16 17:11:25 +05'30'

registration of FIR. Therefore, the first relief sought in the petition cannot be granted.

6. So far as the second relief of providing protection is concerned, ASI Hans Kumar has handed over to the petitioner present in court, the mobile phone number of the concerned Beat Constable to whom she may contact at the time of distress.

7. Accordingly, the petition stands disposed of.

GIRISH KATHPALIA (JUDGE) SEPTEMBER 16, 2026/ry GIRISH KATHPALIA

2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec4 5569af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d155 70996b40f80cbd2eee60402c487965ff801e2 6fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2026.09.16 17:10:54 +05'30'

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead