Delhi High Court

CRL.M.C./6335/2026 of KAWALPREET SINGH & ORS. Vs THE STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR on 16 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010401692026 + CRL.M.C. 6335/2026 KAWALPREET SINGH & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. R. K. Singh, Mr. Varun Thakur and Mr. Suhail Zaheer M., Advs. Petitioners-in-person versus THE STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Hemant

$~31

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

#

CNR No. DLHC010401692026

+

CRL.M.C. 6335/2026

KAWALPREET SINGH & ORS.

.....Petitioners

Through:

Mr. R. K. Singh, Mr. Varun Thakur

and Mr. Suhail Zaheer M., Advs.

Petitioners-in-person

versus

THE STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR

.....Respondents

Through:

Mr. Hemant Mehla, APP with Mr.

Vikrant Deshwal, Adv.

W/SI Surbhi Aggarwal, PS Punjabi

Bagh

Respondent no.2-in-person (through

VC)

CORAM:

HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE MADHU JAIN

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

O R D E R

% 16.09.2026

1. This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode.

2. The present petition has been filed under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 [hereinafter referred to as ‘BNSS’] seeking quashing of FIR No. 149/2020, registered at Police Station Punjabi Bagh, West District, Delhi, under Sections 498A and 406 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 [hereinafter referred to as ‘IPC’], and all consequential proceedings emanating therefrom, on the basis of an amicable settlement arrived at between the parties vide Memorandum of Understanding [MoU] dated 17.10.2023.

3. Issue Notice. Learned APP for the State accepts notice on behalf of the

State.

4. The Petitioners are present before this Court and Respondent No.2 has appeared before this Court through video conferencing [VC] and all have been duly identified by their respective learned counsels as well as the concerned Investigating Officer [IO].

5. Briefly stated, petitioner No. 1 and respondent No. 2 were married on 11.10.2011 and two daughters were born out of the wedlock. Owing to matrimonial differences, the parties started residing separately in the year 2018, whereafter respondent No. 2 lodged a complaint before the CAW Cell, pursuant to which FIR No. 149/2020 dated 22.02.2020 came to be registered against the petitioners under Sections 498A and 406 read with Section 34 of IPC. During the pendency of the proceedings, petitioner No. 1 and respondent No. 2 amicably resolved their disputes vide Memorandum of understanding [MoU] dated 17.10.2023, and their marriage was subsequently dissolved by a decree of divorce by mutual consent dated 09.10.2024.

6. On a query made by this Court, respondent No. 2, who has been duly identified by the IO, has stated that she entered into the Deed of Settlement/MOU dated 17.10.2023 of her own free will and without any pressure, coercion, undue influence or threat. She has further stated that she has no objection if the aforementioned FIR is quashed.

7. In view of the above, since the parties have amicably resolved their differences of their own free will and without any pressure, coercion, undue influence or threat and their marriage also stands dissolved by a decree of divorce via mutual consent, no useful purpose would be served by continuing the proceedings. Rather, continuation of the proceedings may only give rise to further acrimony between the parties. In these circumstances, this Court is of the view that the interest of justice would be served by bringing the proceedings to an end. Accordingly, FIR No. 149/2020, registered at Police Station Punjabi Bagh, West District, Delhi, under Sections 406, 498A and 34 IPC, and all proceedings arising therefrom, are liable to be quashed.

8. Accordingly, FIR No. 149/2020, registered at Police Station Punjabi Bagh, West District, Delhi, for offences punishable under Sections 498A and 406 read with Section 34 of IPC, and all consequential proceedings emanating therefrom, are hereby quashed.

9. Therefore, the present petition is allowed and thereby, disposed of.

10. Pending application(s), if any, also stand(s), disposed of.

11. A copy of this order be sent to the concerned learned trial Court for necessary information and compliance.

12. The order be uploaded on the website forthwith. MADHU JAIN, J SEPTEMBER 16, 2026/b/PG

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead