Delhi High Court

FAO(OS) (COMM)/250/2026 of SUKHMAY KARAN SATSANG FOUNDATION AND ORS Vs SHREE SWAMINARAYAN SARVOPARI SIDDHANT DIGVIJAY TRUST & ORS. on 16 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010439402026 + FAO(OS) (COMM) 250/2026 & CM APPL. 63129/2026, CM APPL. 63130/2026 & CM APPL. 63131/2026 SUKHMAY KARAN SATSANG FOUNDATION AND ORS .....Appellants Through: Mr. Hemal Kiritkumar Sheth, Mr. Vicky B. Mehta & Mr. Suraj Singh,

$~27

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

CNR No. DLHC010439402026

+

FAO(OS) (COMM) 250/2026 & CM APPL. 63129/2026, CM APPL.

63130/2026 & CM APPL. 63131/2026

SUKHMAY KARAN SATSANG FOUNDATION

AND ORS

.....Appellants

Through:

Mr. Hemal Kiritkumar Sheth, Mr.

Vicky B. Mehta & Mr. Suraj Singh,

Advs.

versus

SHREE SWAMINARAYAN SARVOPARI SIDDHANT DIGVIJAY

TRUST & ORS.

.....Respondents

Through:

Mr. Sandeep Sehti, Senior Adv. with

Mr. Kunal Khanna, Ms. Priyanshi,

Mr.

Parth

Dabas,

Mr.

Krishna

Gambir, Ms. Shreya Sethi, Mr. K C

Patel, Mr. Kirtan Patel & Mr. Vihar

Desai, Advs.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

O R D E R

%

16.09.2026 CM APPL. 63132/2026

1. This application is filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short ‘CPC’) seeking condonation of delay of 63 days in re-filing the appeal.

2. For the reasons mentioned therein, the application is allowed. This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 19/09/2026 at 11:29:34

3. The delay of 63 days in re-filing the appeal is condoned. FAO(OS) (COMM) 250/2026

4. This appeal is filed against the order dated 26.05.2026 whereby an ex- parte interim injunction was granted under Order XXXIX Rule 1 & 2 of the CPC.

5. After hearing learned counsel for the parties, it is revealed that the appellants have not yet filed reply to the application filed under Order XXXIX Rule 1 & 2 of the CPC.

6. Learned counsel for the appellants fairly submits that the reply will be filed within three weeks from today with advance copy to the opposite counsel. The date fixed before the court is 16.11.2026 and let that be preponed.

7. In view of the limited prayer, this appeal is disposed of with the directions that reply, if any, to the application under Order XXXIX Rule 1 & 2 of the CPC be filed within three weeks from today.

8. Rejoinder, if any, be filed within one week thereafter.

9. Let the application under Order XXXIX Rule 1 & 2 of the CPC be placed before learned Single Judge on 27.10.2026.

AVNEESH JHINGAN, J

MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA, J SEPTEMBER 16, 2026 ‘JK’

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 19/09/2026 at 11:29:34

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead