Delhi High Court

BAIL APPLN./3884/2026 of SHEIKH AKRAM Vs STATE NCT OF DELHI on 16 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010439212026 + BAIL APPLN. 3884/2026 & CRL.M.A. 28704/2026 SHEIKH AKRAM .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Amjad Khan, Mr. Mohd. Saleem, Mr. Sumit Kumar, Advocates. versus STATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, APP for

$~65

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

CNR No. DLHC010439212026

+

BAIL APPLN. 3884/2026 & CRL.M.A. 28704/2026

SHEIKH AKRAM

.....Petitioner

Through:

Mr. Amjad Khan, Mr. Mohd. Saleem,

Mr. Sumit Kumar, Advocates.

versus

STATE NCT OF DELHI

.....Respondent

Through:

Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, APP for State

with SI Rahul Mehta and SI Sandeep,

PS Prasad Nagar.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

O R D E R

%

16.09.2026

1. The accused/applicant seeks regular bail in case FIR No. 577/2025 of PS Prasad Nagar for offence under Section 318(4)/319(2)/238/204/305/ 317(2)/61(2)/3(5) of BNS.

2. The allegation against the accused/applicant is that along with the co- accused persons, he conducted fake raid of income tax on the premises of the complainant de facto. One of the accused persons was wearing police uniform. The CCTV footage has been shown in Court.

3. After addressing partly, learned counsel for accused/applicant, on instructions, seeks permission to withdraw this regular bail application with liberty to file afresh subsequent to testimony of the complainant de facto, for which trial is stated to be already listed on 14.10.2026.

4. As requested, the regular bail application and the accompanying This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 17/09/2026 at 11:16:08

application are dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as sought. It is also made clear that if within two months from the date already fixed before the trial court, the testimony of complainant de facto is not recorded, the accused/applicant shall be at liberty to file bail application before the trial court. In order to ensure that complainant de facto appears for recording his testimony on 14.10.2026, copy of this order be sent to the concerned SHO.

GIRISH KATHPALIA, J SEPTEMBER 16, 2026/dr

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 17/09/2026 at 11:16:08

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead