Delhi High Court

RFA(COMM)/623/2026 of M/S HOTEL PRANAMINN PVT. LTD. Vs M/S REAL INNERSPRING TECHNOLOGIES PVT. LTD. on 16 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010439672026 + RFA(COMM) 623/2026 CM APPL. 63154/2026 CM APPL. 63155/2026 CM APPL. 63156/2026 CM APPL. 63157/2026 M/S HOTEL PRANAMINN PVT. LTD. .....APPELLANT Through: Mr. Mohd. Fuzail Khan, Ms. Shisba Chawla & Mr. Bishnucharan Sarangi, Advs.

$~90

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

CNR No. DLHC010439672026

+

RFA(COMM) 623/2026 CM APPL. 63154/2026 CM APPL.

63155/2026 CM APPL. 63156/2026 CM APPL. 63157/2026

M/S HOTEL PRANAMINN PVT. LTD.

.....APPELLANT

Through:

Mr. Mohd. Fuzail Khan, Ms. Shisba

Chawla & Mr. Bishnucharan Sarangi,

Advs.

versus

M/S REAL INNERSPRING TECHNOLOGIES PVT. LTD.

.....RESPONDENT

Through:

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

O R D E R

%

16.09.2026

1. Learned counsel for the appellant argued that the impugned judgment and decree dated 17.11.2025 has been passed ex-parte and that no notice was served upon the appellant, who was the defendant in the suit.

2. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the appellant sought liberty to withdraw the present appeal, however, with liberty to file an application under Order IX Rule 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 pointing out before the Court concerned, that no notice was served upon the appellant-defendant.

3. With the liberty as prayed, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/09/2026 at 11:31:48

4. All pending applications stand disposed of.

5. In case the appellant moves an application before the Competent Court, the same shall be decided in accordance with law, without being influenced by the fact that the appellant had preferred an appeal and withdrawn the same.

6. Since the appellant had withdrawn the present appeal, the Court fee deposited by the appellant be refunded if permissible under law. DINESH MEHTA, J. RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA, J. SEPTEMBER 16, 2026/sid This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/09/2026 at 11:31:48

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead