Delhi High Court

CRL.M.C./6820/2026 of SAGAR MAHAJAN AND ORS Vs STATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR on 15 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010435592026 + CRL.M.C. 6820/2026 & CRL.M.A. 28487/2026 SAGAR MAHAJAN AND ORS .....Petitioners Through: Mr. V.K. Chaturvedi, Adv. Petitioners in person. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Digam Singh Dagar, APP with

$~106

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

#

CNR No. DLHC010435592026

+

CRL.M.C. 6820/2026 & CRL.M.A. 28487/2026

SAGAR MAHAJAN AND ORS

.....Petitioners

Through:

Mr. V.K. Chaturvedi, Adv.

Petitioners in person.

versus

STATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR

.....Respondents

Through:

Mr. Digam Singh Dagar, APP with

Ms. Isha Tyagi, Mr. Adesh Nandal,

Advs. for the State.

R2 in person (through VC)

Mr.

Varun

Mittal,

Adv.

for

R2

(through VC)

ASI Kishor, PS North Rohini.

CORAM:

HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE MADHU JAIN

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

O R D E R

% 15.09.2026

1. This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode.

2. The present petition has been filed under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 [hereinafter referred to as ‘BNSS’] seeking quashing of FIR No. 697/2024 registered at Police Station North Rohini, District Rohini, Delhi, for offences punishable under Sections 498A and 406 read with section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 [hereinafter referred to as ‘IPC’] and all proceedings emanating therefrom, on the basis of the settlement arrived at between the parties.

3. Issue notice. The learned APP for the State accepts notice on behalf of the State.

4. The petitioners and respondent no. 2 in the aforesaid petition have appeared before this Court through Video Conferencing [VC] and have been duly identified by their respective learned counsels and Investigating Officer [IO].

5. Briefly stated, petitioner No. 1 and respondent No. 2 were married on 19.11.2013 at Hubli, Karnataka, and a son was born from the wedlock on 14.08.2015. Owing to matrimonial differences, the parties started residing separately from 11.04.2022, whereafter respondent No.2 lodged the aforesaid FIR on 29.10.2024 against the petitioners. The marriage between petitioner No. 1 and respondent No. 2 subsequently stood dissolved by a decree of divorce dated 06.03.2026 passed in HMA No. 2758/2022. Thereafter, the parties amicably settled all their disputes vide Memorandum of Understanding [MoU] dated 14.05.2026 for a total sum of ₹45,00,000/-, out of which ₹22,50,000/- has already been paid and the balance amount of ₹22,50,000/- is agreed to be paid at the time of recording the statement of respondent No.2 for quashing of the FIR.

6. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the entire settlement amount has already been paid to respondent No. 2 in terms of the settlement arrived at between the parties.

7. On a query made by this Court, respondent No. 2, who has been duly identified by the IO, has stated that she entered into the MoU dated 14.05.2026 of her own free will and without any pressure, coercion, undue influence or threat. She has further stated that she has no objection if the aforementioned FIR is quashed.

8. In view of the above, since the parties have amicably resolved their differences of their own free will and without any pressure, coercion, undue influence or threat, and the marriage between petitioner No. 1 and respondent No. 2 already stands dissolved by a decree of divorce dated 06.03.2026, no useful purpose would be served by continuing the proceedings. Rather, continuation of the proceedings may only give rise to further acrimony between the parties. In these circumstances, this Court is of the view that the interest of justice would be served by bringing the proceedings to an end. Accordingly, the aforesaid FIR and all proceedings arising therefrom are liable to be quashed.

9. Therefore, FIR No. 697/2024, registered at Police Station North Rohini, District Rohini, Delhi, for the offences punishable under Sections 498A and 406 read with Section 34 of the IPC along with all consequential proceedings emanating therefrom, is hereby quashed.

10. The present petition is thereby, disposed of.

11. The pending application also stands disposed of.

12. A copy of this order be sent to the concerned learned Trial Court for necessary information and compliance.

13. The order be uploaded on the website forthwith. MADHU JAIN, J SEPTEMBER 15, 2026/ys/PG

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead