Delhi High Court
W.P.(C)/13366/2026 of PARVEEN KUMAR Vs UNION OF INDIA & ORS. on 14 September 2026
13366/2026 Page 1 of 2 $~49 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010433422026 + W.P.(C) 13366/2026, CM APPL. 62208/2026, CM APPL. 62209/2026 & CM APPL. 62210/2026 PARVEEN KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Karan Chahar and Ms. Pooja Chahar, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA &
W.P.(C) 13366/2026
$~49
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
CNR No. DLHC010433422026
+
W.P.(C) 13366/2026, CM APPL. 62208/2026, CM APPL.
62209/2026 & CM APPL. 62210/2026
PARVEEN KUMAR
.....Petitioner
Through:
Mr. Karan Chahar and Ms.
Pooja Chahar, Advs.
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
.....Respondents
Through:
Mr. Harsh Choudhary, CGSC
and Mr. Vanshul Pali, GP, R-1 & 2
Mr. Vijay Joshi, CGSC and Ms. Katyayani
Joshi, GP.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH
ARORA
ORDER (ORAL)
%
14.09.2026
C. HARI SHANKAR, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
1
Decisions referred to
In this index
1
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The petitioner had earlier approached this Court by way of WP (C) 11917/2023, which was withdrawn on 29 April 2026, stating that he anticipated relief at the administrative level.
2. Though no such relief has been granted, he has re-approached this Court on the ground that, after he withdrew his earlier writ petition, certain orders have been passed by the respondents which, if applied to the petitioner, would substantiate his entitlement to relief. Digitally Signed By:AJIT KUMAR Signing Date:21.09.2026 15:51:31 Signature Not Verified
W.P.(C) 13366/2026
3. We refrain from expressing any opinion on his contention, as it has not been advanced before the Central Administrative Tribunal1. Applying the principles contained in para 93 of the judgment of the Supreme Court in L. Chandra Kumar v. Union of India2, this Court cannot act as a Court of first instance and examine aspects which were not urged before the Tribunal.
4. In as much as the above orders have been issued by the respondents, after the petitioner withdrew the earlier writ petition, Mr. Karan Chahar seeks leave to withdraw this writ petition submitting that he would have approached the Tribunal for appropriate relief.
5. Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case of the petitioner, we permit him to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to approach the Tribunal, if so advised.
6. The writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn.
C. HARI SHANKAR, J
MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA, J
SEPTEMBER 14, 2026/ss
1 “the Tribunal”, hereinafter. 2 (1997) 3 SCC 261 Digitally Signed By:AJIT KUMAR Signing Date:21.09.2026 15:51:31 Signature Not Verified