Delhi High Court
BAIL APPLN./4683/2025 of DHANKESH YADAV Vs STATE OF NCT OF DELHI on 14 September 2026
HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010970292025 + BAIL APPLN. 4683/2025 DHANKESH YADAV .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Vivek Sood, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Rajiv Dwan and Mr. Manoj Kumar, Advocates. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for State with
$~1
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
CNR No. DLHC010970292025
+
BAIL APPLN. 4683/2025
DHANKESH YADAV
.....Petitioner
Through:
Mr. Vivek Sood, Sr. Advocate with
Mr. Rajiv Dwan and Mr. Manoj
Kumar, Advocates.
versus
STATE OF NCT OF DELHI
.....Respondent
Through:
Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for State
with SI Sandeep and SI Suman.
Mr. Nishan Datta and Mr. Chirag,
Advocates for complainant.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
%
14.09.2026 Matter taken up today as the date of 11.09.2026 was declared a holiday on account of BRICS Summit vide Notification No. 86/G- 4/Genl.I/DHC dated 08.09.2026.
1. The accused/applicant seeks regular bail in case FIR No. 83/2023 of PS Mayapuri for offence under Section 420/467/468/471/472/120B IPC.
2. By way of order dated 24.04.2025, the earlier bail application was allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to file afresh upon receipt of FSL report. That FSL report is relevant to examine the allegation of forgery of the title deeds pertaining to the Green Park property. By the time this bail application was filed in this court, FSL report had not come, so it ought not to have been filed. Be that as it may, during pendency of this application, FSL report is stated to have come but the same is not on record of this application.
3. In my view, the FSL report would be a change in circumstance, so the issue of bail must be first tested by the Court of Sessions. That being so, learned Senior Counsel for accused/applicant, on instructions, seeks permission to withdraw this application with liberty to file afresh before the Court of Sessions.
4. Accordingly, the regular bail application is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as sought. At request of learned Senior Counsel, it is made clear that in the fresh application to be filed before the Court of Sessions, the accused/applicant shall be at liberty to raise the remaining grounds, if any, also.
GIRISH KATHPALIA, J SEPTEMBER 14, 2026/ry
5. The matter is again taken up on mentioning by learned Senior Counsel for accused/applicant, submitting that the learned Court of Sessions has already dealt with the forensic report, so no purpose would be served by sending the accused/applicant back.
6. Since the earlier orders were passed in the bail applications of Dhankesh Yadav as well as of Ajit taking a view that there are certain common factual allegations against both of them, and since learned counsel for accused Ajit is not present, it would not be fair to hear on merits.
7. Therefore, the order passed in pre-lunch session is modified only to the extent that both accused/applicants, namely Dhankesh Yadav and Ajit may file fresh bail applications before this court itself along with FSL report.
GIRISH KATHPALIA, J SEPTEMBER 14, 2026/ry