Delhi High Court
BAIL APPLN./2493/2026 of ROBIN JAIN Vs STATE OF NCT OF DELHI on 10 September 2026
2493/2026 Page 1 of 2 pages $~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 10.09.2026 # CNR No. DLHC010282542026 + BAIL APPLN. 2493/2026 ROBIN JAIN .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Abhishek Pandey, Advocate (through video conferencing). versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI
Page 1 of 2 pages
$~3
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
%
Date of Decision: 10.09.2026
CNR No. DLHC010282542026
+
BAIL APPLN. 2493/2026
ROBIN JAIN
.....Petitioner
Through:
Mr. Abhishek Pandey, Advocate
(through video conferencing).
versus
STATE OF NCT OF DELHI
.....Respondent
Through:
Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for State
with IO/SI Sachin Sharma.
CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA
J U D G M E N T (ORAL)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The accused/applicant seeks anticipatory bail in case FIR No.800037855/2026 of PS Laxmi Nagar for offence under Section 305 BNS.
2. At the outset, learned APP for State, assisted by IO/SI Sachin Sharma, submits that the accused/applicant was arrested and produced before the trial magistrate on 24.07.2026, after which the IO was granted two days police custody and thereafter, on 27.07.2026 the accused/applicant was released on bail by the magisterial court. It is submitted by learned APP that neither the GIRISH KATHPALIA Digitally signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI, 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec 45569af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d1 5570996b40f80cbd2eee60402c487965ff80 1e26fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2026.09.10 16:43:05 +05'30' Digitally Signed By:DIKSHA RAWAT Signing Date:10.09.2026 16:45:45 Signature Not Verified
Page 2 of 2 pages accused/applicant nor his counsel nor even the IO or the APP before the trial court disclosed about pendency of the present application. It is submitted by learned APP that the accused/applicant obtained bail from magisterial court after concealing that in the present anticipatory bail application, no protection from arrest had been granted.
3. Learned counsel for accused/applicant does not dispute that the learned magistrate was not informed about pendency of this application and the view taken by this court that no interim relief could be granted.
4. In view of above circumstances, the anticipatory bail application is dismissed.
5. Copy of this order be sent to the concerned magistrate for information and appropriate action. Copy of this order be also sent to the concerned DCP and the Director of Prosecution to enquire into the conduct of the IO as well as learned APP of the magisterial court, who did not disclose before the magistrate about pendency of this application.
GIRISH KATHPALIA (JUDGE) SEPTEMBER 10, 2026/ry GIRISH KATHPALIA Digitally signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI, 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4af ec45569af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacc a, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d 15570996b40f80cbd2eee60402c487965ff 801e26fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2026.09.10 16:42:53 +05'30' Digitally Signed By:DIKSHA RAWAT Signing Date:10.09.2026 16:45:45 Signature Not Verified