Delhi High Court

ITA/437/2024 of PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-12, DELHI Vs SMT. SALONI NARANG on 10 September 2026

Cites 1, Cited by 17

Page 1 of 2 $~25 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision: 10.09.2026 Date of uploading: 15.09.2026 # CNR No. DLHC010505912024 + ITA 437/2024 PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-12, DELHI ....Appellant Through: Mr. Siddhartha Sinha, SSC versus SMT. SALONI NARANG

ITA 437/2024 Page 1 of 2

$~25

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

%

Date of decision: 10.09.2026

Date of uploading: 15.09.2026

CNR No. DLHC010505912024

+

ITA 437/2024

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-12, DELHI ....Appellant Through:

Mr. Siddhartha Sinha, SSC

versus

SMT. SALONI NARANG

.....Respondent

Through:

Dr. Rakesh Gupta, Sr. Adv. with

Mr.Somil Agarwal & Mr. Dushyant

Agrawal, Advs.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA

Citations and Judicial Treatment

Cited · treatment not yet classified

Cited by

17

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

1

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

J U D G M E N T

DINESH MEHTA, J. (ORAL)

1. The present appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 has been directed against the common judgment in the order dated 19.06.2023 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bench “D” New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as “the Tribunal”), whereby the Tribunal has allowed appeals filed by the respondent/assessee for the Assessment Year (AY) 2006-07, while relying upon judgment of this Court rendered in the case of Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Central-1, Delhi v. Smt. Sneh Lata Sawhney and Ors. reported in 2025:DHC:3617-DB.

2. Before Mr. Siddhartha Sinha, learned Senior Standing Counsel for the Digitally Signed By:NAVEEN KUMAR Signing Date:15.09.2026 16:26:32 Signature Not Verified

ITA 437/2024 Page 2 of 2 appellant could advance his submissions, Dr. Rakesh Gupta, learned Senior Counsel for the respondent, submitted that even if the best argument of the appellant is to be taken into account, the appellant’s appeal is anyway liable to be rejected, in view of the recent judgment of this Court rendered on 22.01.2026, in the case of Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Central-1, Delhi v. Sanjay Jain reported in 2026:DHC:585-DB.

3. Mr. Siddhartha Sinha, learned Senior Standing Counsel for the appellant, is not in a position to controvert the aforesaid position of facts and law.

4. Having heard learned counsel for the parties, we are of the considered opinion that the appeal is liable to be dismissed in light of the judgment of this Court in the case of Sneh Lata Sawhney (supra) which has further been followed and elaborated by this Court in the case of Sanjay Jain (supra).

5. The appeal stands dismissed accordingly. DINESH MEHTA (JUDGE) RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA (JUDGE) SEPTEMBER 10, 2026 kk Digitally Signed By:NAVEEN KUMAR Signing Date:15.09.2026 16:26:32 Signature Not Verified

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead